Skip to main content

A reflection on controlled assessments

Well, it's nearly the end of the first classes going through the new controlled assessments for GCSE and my thoughts on this are thus:

Overall, not too painful for teachers or students. We have given (in nearly all cases) our pupils three goes at speaking assessments, after initially planning for four. The first we did at the end of Y10 during gained time when we were able to get cover. The second oral CA was during the December mocks in Y11 and the last one is coming up in very early May, just before the deadline. Again we have managed to secure cover for them. We chose tried and tested topics: school, food and healthy eating, holidays and free time (depending on the class). We tried to choose topics which fitted in chronologically with our existing scheme. I couldn't see the point in going for more original topics. My feeling was that we can do more creative things outside the assessment system and that the safe topics would score good marks.

Marking the spoken CAs has been time-consuming, especially in view of the amount of moderation needed to get the marking right. We have had three lengthy twilight sessions listening to sound files and tweaking marks. Those sessions can be amusing and not at all dull, but they take time. We have learned that it takes a while to mark accurately. We were too fierce to start with. We found it useful, as experienced teachers, to consider roughly what grade we thought a tests merited. We have a good idea of what  C grade sounds like and what and A* sounds like. This influenced us to some extent when interpreting the mark scheme. Overall, we found it easy enough to use the mark scheme.

I still feel that the new format involves too much learning by heart, but the results produced by the AQA's mark scheme seem about right and pupils have prepared well for the tests on the whole. The best students have excellent memories so perform well, the less able dry up more and get the mark they deserve. Those who do not prepare thoroughly also get what they deserve. Some students got nervous, but I had the feeling that there were fewer nerves than with the old "one off" test.

As for the written assessments, we have done just two timed essays, one on free time and one on fitness and health. We decided not to feed back marks to students, but to just inform them if we thought their mark was below expectation. In these cases students have been happy to have a second go. A few have actually requested it. We did these essays in the spring term of Y11. We did not wish to clutter up the Y10 scheme of work with endless assessments. This has worked fine and I cannot see us changing next time. It also meant that we did not allow spoken CAs and written CAs to overlap. Spanish and German happily worked around the French, but essentially followed the same format, with similar topics.

We have learned that preparation is best done at home after a teaching sequence of about three weeks. Preparation in class is fraught with difficulties: lack of concentration, doubts about what information can be shared and the vexed issue of not being allowed to take drafts home.We hand out bullet points a week before the CA and treat it as an extended homework.

The only change in our practice I can envisage at this moment would be not to leave the final spoken CA quite so late, just before the deadline for sending in marks.

The serious issue with all this, in my view, is the one of assessment reliability. We cannot control what help is given at home, we cannot stop students using Google Translate and the system allows teachers to bend the rules too easily. With regard to re-sits, for example, the fact that you can create a new task by changing just one bullet point means, effectively, that the students can write the same essay again. (Bear in mind that the instructions say "you may include" ahead of the bullet points.) I daresay most teachers are scrupulously fair about the conduct of assessments, but the system almost invites malpractice and therefore fails the primary test of an assessment system: reliability.

For that reason alone, I would favour a return to an examination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.

Attitudes16





An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at dolanguages.com, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…