Skip to main content

Will it all end in tiers?

Michael Gove has said that he is unhappy with the idea of different tiers in GCSE examinations*. He argues that the Foundation tier limits aspiration.

It is easy to see where his argument fits within the agenda of raising aspirations for all but we need to look at this carefully.

Although the GCSE was set up in 1987 to be an exam aimed at nearly the whole ability range and to replace the discredited sheep/goats O-levels and CSE, it was immediately obvious that a one-exam-fits-all would not work in practice. Tiers (they were called levels then, with Foundation tier originally called Basic level) were set up to deal with this issue, with most exams having two tiers, maths even having three tiers in early incarnations of the system.

The fact of the matter is that the range of pupil aptitude is so wide that, for the most able, an all-encompassing exam would have sections which are far too easy, and for the least able, much of the exam would be beyond their capability. This is not a question of low aspiration, this is just a fact of life.

Maths and modern languages teachers in particular are aware of the problems teaching a wide range of abilities. In other subjects varying aptitudes can be accommodated more easily. This is why most secondary schools put their maths and languages pupils in sets.

One obvious problem of tiering in practice is that there are many pupils on the borderline of Foundation and Higher and for whom delicate decisions have to be made based on the teacher's knowledge, pupils' prior attainment and the individual wishes of the student and even parent. It is not always easy to get this right, and because exam boards change their grading assessments each year the teacher cannot be certain that he or she has made the decision which will ensure the best grade outcome.

Does tiering also, as claimed, put a limit on aspiration and the amount of work a pupil will do? There may be something in this, but my own experience is that a decision to enter a pupil for Foundation tier is based on a realistic assessment of aptitude and that, for many pupils, Foundation tier is a significant challenge.

Now, you might argue that it is not beyond our wits to be able to design a common examination for nearly all pupils. Well, yes, and it would be rather like what we had in the early days of GCSE, whereby all Higher level pupils entered for both Foundation (Basic) and Higher level. This meant that very bright students did questions which were far too easy for them, but the justification was that they had to show they could jump the easy hurdles too.

 I would argue that, in modern languages at least, tiering is still a sensible solution if you are to have a single qualification for nearly all pupils. We do not want to put pupils of moderate aptitude through assessments they simply cannot cope with, whatever their efforts and the efforts of the teacher. Conversely, it is a waste of time for very bright students to be doing assessments below their natural level.

Tiering was a clever solution to the initial conundrum of having one exam for all abilities. The overlapping element in the papers allows the weaker candidate to be stretched and the reasonably bright student to cope with the tougher papers.

And, just as a coda here, how about a new name for whatever succeeds GCSE?
GCE Standard level?
GCE Foundation level?
Foundation baccalaureate?


Oh and (Columbo voice)... just one more thing. We could return to the word level which we all understand very clearly. "Foundation tier" is the equivalent of a British Rail "standard class" ticket.

*UPDATE February 2013

We have kept the term GCSE, but as things stand, Michael Gove has rejected the idea of tiers for the exam. We shall see if this survives consultation. It should not.


Popular posts from this blog

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.


An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

Learning strategies (3)

This is the third in the mini-series of blogs about learning strategies. So far, we have looked at some (rather scant) research evidence for the effectiveness of strategies. Bear in mind that a lack of research evidence does not mean strategies do not work; if there is any consensus, it is that they are probably useful and probably best used when integrated into a normal teaching sequence. We then looked at a classification of different types of strategies.

In this blog Gianfanco and I look at how you might integrate strategies into your teaching. There is nothing revolutionary about this stuff! You may do a good deal of this type of thing already, but you may also be new to the concepts and applications of learning strategies.

Let's look at how you might use strategies, particularly with regard to the teaching of listening and reading. Remember: this is just about how you help students to use strategies to become better listeners and readers.

How to teach strategies 

The research …