Skip to main content

New GCSE and A-level MFL exams first teaching in September 2016

This letter from Ofqual, published today, confirms that new specifications for languages at GCSE and A-level will be taught from September 2016. We can expect the former to ditch the current arrangements for controlled assessment and for the latter to have some more input from Russell Group universities.

Although I am no longer at the chalkface I know I would be happy to see an end to the current regime of controlled assessment, with its over-emphasis on memorisation, variable marking standards and opportunities for malpractice. I am one of those who would prefer a linear course with terminal assessment.

From the documents we have seen so far, however, I am bound to be disappointed by the continued attachment to writing and possible move towards translation. As always the key challenge will be to provide an assessment regime which supports the less able whilst challenging the strong linguists. I do not believe this can be done without a tiering system. I suspect Ofqual agree, even if Michael Gove does not.

It is less clear what might change at A-level as this exam has tended to remain quite traditional with its attachment to the traditional essay and translation. I would expect familiar contemporary topics to remain along with what we have come to call "cultural topics". I would like to see improvements to mark schemes and would like to see less emphasis on essays (which produce unpredictable marks) and translation (which encourages teachers to abandon target language use in the classroom).

The involvement of universities means we could see A-level becoming too much of a preparation for university MFL courses, as it was in the second half of the twentieth century before teachers and exam boards set their own agenda). The danger of this is that students who do not seek this will be put off from taking the subject.

One policy aim should be to reverse the serious decline in the A-level entries. With this in mind perhaps we should be considering a syllabus with stronger vocational/business orientated elements (à la OCR syllabus of some years ago). GCSE content, usually perceived as dull by teachers and pupils, will also need to be livened up to encourage take-up at KS4.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,