Skip to main content

Co-teaching new AS and A-levels

You'll be aware by now that the new AS-Level for first teaching in September 2016 is a so-called "stand-alone" or "decoupled" qualification so any marks gained from it will not count towards A-level. Like all other AS-levels, however, it has been designed to be co-teachable with A-level. It remains to be seen how many schools will embrace this idea. Certainly the exam boards anticipate a large fall in AS entries as school focus on the traditional three linear A-levels taught over two years.

For schools which do go down the co-teaching route, what are the implications?

Recall that for AS-level students have to be taught either a literary text or a film. For the full A-level students have to study either a book and a film or two books. In terms of themes/topics, the AS-level material is incorporated within the A-level themes.

Students in schools who do offer AS-levels in Y12 could do their language for a year, take the AS exam and get a grade. This may influence their decision to carry on into Y13.

If I had to co-teach I think I would do it this way:

I would teach a film in Y12. For some students the leap to studying a full novel or play in Y12 would be quite high. In Y13 I would then teach either a second film and a text, or two texts. On balance, with most groups, I would probably go for a film in the autumn term and a text in the spring term.

In Y12 I would cover the AS-level themes spelled out in the specification (see my previous blog) and add any other material I thought were worthwhile or topical. I would build in grammar revision the content of which would depend on the group. Some groups would need the basics going over again, others not so much.

Is there a case for using the film studied in Y12 for the A-level entry in Y13? You could do this, but the film (or text) would need to be re-visited in Y13 which would make for clumsy planning. I would do a separate film (or text in Y13). Don't forget that in Y113 students will need to do their personal research project too, but they (and teachers) should not make a huge meal out of this. The assessment of this project will take several minutes of the speaking exam - that's all.

In theory AS-level is meant to be as difficult as A-level (but with less of it). The draft specimen material just published shows that the essay questions on the texts and films are less challenging than at A-level. This makes sense and I hope Ofqual agree. If they toughened up the essay questions at AS-level this would sink a lot of candidates.

On the basis I have suggested, co-teaching, though not ideal, can be done effectively enough. Certain decisions need to be made. Do candidates intent on doing a two year A-level need to take the AS-level? They would end up with two qualifications. I imagine most would want to do that. As I suggested above, it would give them a clear idea of where they stand in terms of grade. It would also be valuable exam practice and may sharpen up their motivation half way through the course. The AS-level would be a higher stakes alternative to an internal end of Y12 exam.

Given the paucity of modern linguists at A-level schools and departments may be keen to offer AS-level to increase their numbers and to create economically viable classes. They will also naturally want to encourage as many students as possible to benefit from language learning. Budgets will be getting tighter in coming years. Some departments will even be asked to collapse groups from Y12 and Y13 - this is far from ideal.

Much of this will come down to whole school policies which will factor in, amongst other things, the cost of exam entries. I would certainly argue for keeping AS-level and for co-teaching.

Comments

  1. The new AS is the same level of demand as the current AS - the standard that you would expect to achieve at the end of Y12. It's not like the old stand alone pre Curriculum 2000 AS.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I had heard that on an AQA webinar. I had thought that originally Michael Gove wanted AS to be as challenging as A-level. That must have changed somewhere along the line. Thanks for commenting, Frances.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.

Attitudes16





An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at dolanguages.com, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…