Skip to main content

How did we end up with some good A-level specifications?

When the government decided it wanted to reform A-levels, they set up a committee called ALCAB, largely made up of Russell Group university academics. ALCAB looked at the existing specifications and recorded a number of perceived weaknesses.

Firstly, they noted that there was too much inconsistency between schools in terms of the challenge offered by the cultural topics being studied. For example, was it right that some schools taught a relatively shallow film whilst others were teaching lengthy, serious novels? This meant the assessment was not as robust as it should be.

Secondly, they were concerned that not enough language study was being conducted in the context of the target language culture. The panel was concerned that too many of their undergraduates were arriving at university with inadequate knowledge of the culture of their language of study.

Thirdly, they claimed that the current A-levels did not present enough if a cognitive challenge, leaving them devalued when compared with some other A-levels. In particular, they were worried that they did not produce students with a thorough enough command of grammar.

Finally, ALCAB believed that a renewed A-level could attract more students to the subject, including students who may have had the perception that languages were simply not as interesting as subjects like physics, history and English literature.

In short, ALCAB felt that A-level was not a good enough preparation for higher education. Let us not forget that the DfE had already stated that the main aim of A-level was to produce university-ready students.

ALCAB's response to their perceived inadequacies and their recipe for improving A-level involved a number of recommendations: beefing up the grammatical element, having prescribed lists of books and films (thus devaluing other areas beyond film and literature), introducing a independent research project and insisting that cultural content be both firmly embedded in the specifications and assessed.

As far as the latter point is concerned, ALCAB proposed that the film and literature be assessed by essays in English. This, they felt, would ensure a greater level of cognitive challenge. After consultation this was thankfully rejected since it would have led to less teaching in the target language.

Furthermore, to ensure the syllabus was challenging, ALCAB produced an "indicative list" of topics rooted in the culture of the language of study. These included topics such as French impressionism, the new wave of French cinema, the Spanish Civil War and French mathematics. It contained interesting elements, but too many were inappropriate as a basis for designing communicative lessons; so much so that the exam boards were initially alarmed by how off-putting some of the topics would be to students, especially at a time of falling entries.

Using their experience and by eliciting teachers' views, the exam boards set about producing specifications which were in line with the DfE/ALCAB subject guidance. They avoided topics which they felt would be too dry and unteachable, used the best of the (quite popular with teachers) existing specifications and, in conjunction with publishers, have come up with what are looking like good text books. So far, two specifications, those from Pearson and AQA, have been accredited.

The new specifications represent an evolution, not a revolution. They also represent a return to previous practice, for example, the research project looks a lot like what we used to call coursework and there is nothing new about prescribed lists of works. The nature of the challenge to students is somewhat different, with a greater emphasis placed on translation at AS-level, summary work, personal research and essay writing on film and literature in exam conditions. It is also true that actual knowledge of the target language culture in general will play a slightly greater role in lessons - look out for more texts featuring factual information and history, for example.

In the end, after initial dismay and alarm, the exam boards have made the new A-levels more than palatable. Will they make languages more attractive to students as ALCAB hoped? No. This would have involved quite a different type of reform, one which would have viewed A-level as a stimulating course in its own right, not one designed as a preparation for that minority who carry on with languages at university. We remain very stuck in our ways.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad


Popular posts from this blog

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

Making words memorable

Most teachers and researchers would agree that knowing words is even more important than knowing grammar if you wish to be proficient in a language. As linguist David Wilkins wrote in 1972: "Without grammar little can be conveyed, without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed."One of the frustrations for teachers is pupils' inability to retain vocabulary for productive use. A good deal of research has been done over the years into how pupils might better keep words in memory. Two concepts which have come to the fore are spacing and interleaving.

Spaced practice

A 2003 review of the literature by P.Y. Gu reported that most studies show that students frequently forget words after learning them just once.  Anderson and Jordan (1928) discovered that after initial learning, then one week, three weeks and eight weeks thereafter, the recall success was 66%, 48%, 39% and 37% respectively. Other studies have produced similar results. Unsurprisingly, these researchers recommend, space…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’( The point i…