Skip to main content

Ofqual research on effect of native speakers on A-level results

This is long overdue.

Ofqual is finally addressing, as part of its general review of grading, the issue of to what extent native speakers affect the allocation of grades. We know that grading at A-level is relatively tough. We also know that relatively few students get A* grades. When you then factor in that a proportion of those starred grades go to fluent native speakers, it makes it pretty tough for clever non-native linguists to get those prized A*s. This may discourage some students from taking languages at all.

Here is what Ofqual are saying. I have copied part of their blog post. I would urge you to help Ofqual by contacting Rachel Taylor at the email address below.

"Ofqual is set to conduct research on the impact of native speakers on exam results in A level modern foreign languages (MFLs). To ensure our research is as accurate as possible we’re asking for help from schools so that we can gain a greater understanding of the types of students sitting A level MFL this summer.

We’re conducting the research because we know from anecdotal evidence that there are concerns about the potential impact of native speakers on A level MFL results. In particular, there are concerns that the number of native speakers is increasing and that, as a result, students for whom the MFL is a second language are being disadvantaged. These concerns are mainly associated with the largest entry MFL specifications, rather than what are commonly known as community languages.

The research will aim to quantify the number of native speakers sitting A levels in French, German, Spanish, Italian and Russian this summer. Currently, this information is not readily available at the national level so if we can find out the numbers it will be a great starting point. We also want to explore how native speakers perform on the assessments.

To help our research, exam boards will be providing us with details of the students sitting A level French, German, Spanish, Italian and Russian this summer. We’ll then ask all the schools that have entered students to these subjects to let us know if any of their students are native speakers or have native speaker characteristics.

Collecting this information won’t be easy, as there isn’t always a clear definition of a native speaker; their immersion in their native language will vary for a number of reasons. We will therefore be seeking feedback from modern language teaching associations to help us develop a questionnaire for students with the aim of gathering information about language experience and proficiency.

In addition, we will be asking teachers to identify which of their students they believe to be native speakers or possess native speaker characteristics. Again, this won’t be easy, but it will provide us with another piece of information to understand the language expertise of the students sitting these A level MFLs.

So I’ll end on a plea – for those schools that we contact in May: please take the time to support this research by asking your students to complete the questionnaires that we send to assess language expertise and proficiency. With your support, we’ll have a much clearer picture of the type of students sitting these subjects and how they perform. This will allow us to better understand and explore the concerns that currently exist about the potential effect of native speakers on all students’ results."

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad


Popular posts from this blog

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

Making words memorable

Most teachers and researchers would agree that knowing words is even more important than knowing grammar if you wish to be proficient in a language. As linguist David Wilkins wrote in 1972: "Without grammar little can be conveyed, without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed."One of the frustrations for teachers is pupils' inability to retain vocabulary for productive use. A good deal of research has been done over the years into how pupils might better keep words in memory. Two concepts which have come to the fore are spacing and interleaving.

Spaced practice

A 2003 review of the literature by P.Y. Gu reported that most studies show that students frequently forget words after learning them just once.  Anderson and Jordan (1928) discovered that after initial learning, then one week, three weeks and eight weeks thereafter, the recall success was 66%, 48%, 39% and 37% respectively. Other studies have produced similar results. Unsurprisingly, these researchers recommend, space…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’( The point i…