Skip to main content

What is cognitive load theory?

There is a lot of discussion in the educational world at the moment about cognition and in particular Cognitive Load Theory, so I thought I would look at this model and relate it to second language learning. Remember that I come at this as a teacher, not an academic scholar!

How information is processed

Cognitive Load Theory builds upon a widely accepted model of human information processing published by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin in 1968. It describes the process as having three main parts: sensory memory,
working memory and long-term memory (Figure 1).

Figure 1



Researchers have added to understanding of this concept over the years, but the basic model remains the same.  Figure 1 shows how processing works. You receive huge amounts of sensory information all the time you are awake. Sensory memory filters out most of this information, but keeps hold of the most important items long enough for them to pass into working memory.  For example, in a crowded room you can hear all sorts of conversations going on, but you attend to the one you are interested in.

So information from your sensory memory passes into your working memory, where it is either processed or discarded. Working memory can generally hold only several items or chunks of information at any one time (estimates vary somewhat, but between four and seven is sometimes quoted).

When your brain processes information, it categorises that information and moves it into long-term memory, where it is stored in knowledge structures called "schemas" (e.g. areas of vocabulary, whole phrases and sentences, or behavioural schemas like driving a car). These organise information according to how you use it. The more practice you get at using these schemas, the more effortless behaviours become. Think of it as speaking naturally without having to plan of the words carefully.

What is Cognitive Load Theory? 

Cognitive Load Theory was developed by John Sweller (1988). "Cognitive load" relates to the amount of information that working memory can hold at one time. Sweller argued that, since working memory has a limited capacity, teaching methods should avoid overloading it with additional activities that don't directly contribute to learning. One obvious way to do this is by making diagrams very clear and not including extraneous information.

Cognitive Load Theory also explains that working memory can be maximised in two ways. First, the brain processes visual and auditory information separately. Auditory items in working memory do not compete with visual items in the same way that two visual items, for example a picture and some text, compete with one another. This is known as the "modality effect."

Secondly, working memory treats an established schema as a single item, and a highly practised "automated" schema hardly counts at all. This means that learning tasks that draw upon existing knowledge expand the capacity of your working memory. This means that teaching people prerequisite skills before introducing a more complex topic, will help them establish schemas that extend their working memory which means that they can understand and learn more difficult information.

Implications for language teachers?

Firstly, it should be made clear that most researchers would argue that language acquisition largely occurs at a sub-conscious level, so they may doubt the relevance of CLT. For example, in the view of Stephen Krashen and others, acquisition occurs as a result of exposure to comprehensible speech and writing. Students "pick up" the language by repeated exposure to vocabulary and syntax just as we do when we learn our first language. There is clearly a lot of truth in this for second language acquisition as anyone who has spent time in the TL country would attest. This view makes the huge assumption that language acquisition is not like the learning of other skills.

On the other hand, most teachers are of the view (even if it receives little support from research) that we can teach items in an ordered way, respecting the tenets of CLT (one item at a time, do not confuse with irrelevant items etc). We tend to believe that we can build up skill with a language, establishing ever more complex schemas as we go along until automaticity (proficiency) is established. (The fact that this only rarely works should give us pause!)

With CLT in mind, the following advice makes sense to me. many of you will find these points obvious and confirm your sensible practice.

1.  In early stages  (when establishing "schemas" in this view of things) teach only one item at a time, e.g. with beginners avoid teaching a whole verb conjugation, focus on practising lots of forms of one verb ending. Most text books respect this principle by only teaching the first and perhaps third person singular of present tense verbs.

2.  Make use of dual coding by using written words, pictures, gesture, realia and video, as long as they are clear and not otherwise distracting.

3.  Make use of dual coding by reading aloud texts as students read them.

4.  If you want to drill one item, e.g. a verb tense, don't sow confusion by including unknown vocabulary. Use this as an opportunity to recycle known vocab.

5. When introducing a new, complex verb tense, take it one step at a time. For example, with the perfect tense in French begin with regular avoir verbs. If students later over-generalise the rule and use avoir with ĂȘtre verbs and reflexives, this is not the end of the world!

5.  Keep listening items brief at beginner level, recycling the same language items as much as possible.

6.  Use a range of question types and other interactions (e.g. true/false, giving false statements to correct) to recycle a limited number of items.

7.  Teach whole chunks as well as individual words. It is important that pupils hear and practise collocation (e.g. jouer au football, as opposed to jouer and football separately) to maximise the space in working memory.

8. Focus as much as possible on the key items to be practised. A lesson may be fun and memorable whilst failing to teach the key items. (Although a fun, memorable lesson may have other benefits in terms of overall motivation.)

9.  At advanced level when, by this model, when large numbers of schemas are established, focus more on general comprehensible input to take advantage of natural language acquisition competence.

10. When doing listening and reading tasks, pre-teach some key items in advance to lighten the load on working memory during the task.

11. Make the material as stimulating as possible so that students wants to engage their senses in the first place!


Concluding remarks

I think CLT has some very useful things to tell us about learning in general and language learning in particular. I doubt very much that it is the whole story for language teachers. To me it makes sense to keep CLT in mind mainly for the earlier stages of language learning (say, up to Y10 in English schools). In addition, if, like many academic scholars, you believe that language acquisition is not subject to the same rules as the learning of other complex skills, you can always fall back on the notion that, even when you do carefully build skills, you are still providing plenty of useful language input which the sub-conscious mechanisms can work on. Maybe we can kill two birds with one stone.

For a more detailed look at this topic as it relates to modern language teaching:

https://gianfrancoconti.wordpress.com/2015/07/05/eight-important-facts-about-working-memory-and-their-implication-of-mfl-teaching-and-learning/

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W., & Spence, J. T. The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 2). New York: Academic Press. pp. 89–195.

Sweller, J (June 1988). "Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning"Cognitive Science12 (2): 257–285. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.

Attitudes16





An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at dolanguages.com, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…