Skip to main content

Fortunately, unfortunately

I came across this useful lesson starter/filler/plenary which you might like. It was tweeted by English language teacher Matthew Stott (@ThisIsMattStott) It's an oral fluency game called Fortunately, Unfortunately. You could use it with intermediate or, perhaps best, with advanced level students.

It's as simple as this: you go round the class inviting sentences to develop a simple narrative beginning each sentence with either fortunately or unfortunately. If you'd rather not go round the class in turn you could use hands-up or no hands-up. You could either give students a free choice or get them to use the words alternately.

The sequence of sentences might go something like this:

Teacher starts: Last week I went on holiday to Spain.

Fortunately, the weather was great for two weeks.
Unfortunately, when we arrived the hotel wasn't finished.
Fortunately our room was very comfortable.
Unfortunately, the food was awful
Fortunately, there was a great restaurant not far from the hotel.
Unfortunately, you had to book in advance to eat there.
Fortunately, we knew someone who worked there and he gave us a table with a great view.
Unfortunately, it was quite expensive.
Fortunately, my father won the lottery three months ago so we can afford to go to expensive restaurants.
Unfortunately, my mum is vegetarian so she didn't like the menu very much.

And so on.

You could do a few rounds of this in quick succession, or even use the activity to reinforce a language or topic area you have been practising (e.g. in the above example holidays and past tenses).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,