Skip to main content

Interpersonal listening

I'm posting my slides from the presentation I gave yesterday at Bishop's Stortford High School.

During our afternoon of CPD Gianfranco Conti presented on working memory, skill-acquisition and their implications for classroom practice. In the section of his presentation on teaching listening skills he focused on matching teaching to John Field's model of how we listen: decoding sounds, lexical search, parsing, meaning and discourse construction.

Gianfranco produced a telling analogy: if we ask a PE teacher how she teaches, say, football, she doesn't just say "we play football", she breaks down the process into different skills, e.g. tackling, passing, dribbling, spacial awareness and so on. This is how we should try to teach listening, he argued, breaking down the activity into the key elements and matching our teaching to them. Not to do this is a disservice to pupils, he said, and I see his point. Gianfranco provided practical lesson ideas, examples of which you'll find on his blog.

I was the "supporting act" at this Teachmeet and focused on what is variously known as interpersonal, two-way or interactive listening. My main point was that a number of lessons which we might consider to be "oral lessons" are, in fact, primarily about listening. I revised the essentials of question-answer technique as a source of meaningful listening and a number of games and game-like tasks you can use to develop comprehension and ensure repeated use of high-frequency language.

We acquire language most effectively when we understand messages, retrieve from memory, practise, repeat and recycle useful language as often as possible. (Not all theorists would agree with it quite in those terms - especially the "practice" bit!)

Whereas Gianfranco focused on decoding and parsing, I was more focused on comprehensible input and communication. The two are clearly not mutually exclusive and can, together, help develop confident listeners. Here are my slides, some of which I have posted before in a different context. The games/activities referred to can be found elsewhere on my blog (just use the Search button).



Comments

  1. Thank you for posting this presentation. Lots of good activities to try!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g