Even when Google Translate was the main challenge, teachers have been concerned with designing homework tasks which make it harder for students to cheat. And I say ‘cheat’ unapologetically, since we know what we are talking about here: passing off work as your own when it isn’t. Because of Google, and now GenAI, teachers have resorted to setting vocab learning, or other tasks which don't require writing. You probably know what I think about vocab learning. If you don’t, look here. In a nutshell, not uselss but... ahem...sub-optimal. Traditionally, many teachers liked to prioritise listening and speaking in class, reserving most writing for homework tasks. Is it time to reverse this? Maybe, to some extent. I still think that in some schools, where teachers are able to hold the line, it is possible to be pretty sure students have done their own work. They just need to know that cheating is unacceptable and will result in unpleasant consequences: a telling-off, detention or rewrite. ...
You should know the game Simon Says already. In case you don't, it's usually used to teach parts of the body. It's the one where students stand up, the teachers gives instructions to student to touch parts of their body. If the teacher precedes the instruction with "Simon Says" (or rather its target language equivalent - in French it is Jacques a dit ) students must perform the gesture, if the teacher does not say "Simon Says", they must not perform the gesture. In general, students who make a mistake drop out. It's an execllent game - and not just for near beginners. It provides lots of simple input and repetition, demands careful listening, and is just fun. I never knew it fail. One slight downside, where students drop out, is that those students are no longer involved. (I found they were still engage to some degree, however.) The dropping out part does add urgency and an extra fun element, but if you wanted to avoid that, you could keep a tally of...