We’ve just had the latest batch of A-Level results in England, Wales and NI. It’s the familiar tale of small cohorts and high results, the latter caused by the former. Results day often provokes reflection, so here is mine! It’s about acknowledgement of failure and accountability. I’m getting political! Over the last decade or so, modern foreign languages in England have been subjected to a succession of reviews, reports and curriculum initiatives. We have had the Teaching Schools Council report on MFL pedagogy (Bauckham, 2016), the work of NCELP, the emphasis on the so-called three pillars of phonics, vocabulary and grammar, and the ALCAB review of A-level. More recently, these ideas have been embedded in curriculum and examination reform, with a strong emphasis on carefully specified vocabulary, phonics and grammatical knowledge. Whatever one thinks of the thinking behind these reforms, it seems reasonable to ask a fairly basic question: H ave they worked? If one important aim was t...
I’ve seen references to this newer version of TPRS (Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Storytelling) from US teachers and was curious to find out more. I asked ChatGPT, which gave me the description below. Given its main sources, I would think the description makes sense, though no doubt TPRS-users would differ in their interpretations. After sharing the AI description, I’ll add a few thoughts about TPRS (both versions). I risk treading on one or two toes! ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… TPRS 2.0 is an updated version of Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Storytelling (TPRS) , developed and promoted by Blaine Ray and colleagues. Unlike the original TPRS, which emphasized comprehensible input through teacher-led storytelling and reading, TPRS 2.0 deliberately builds in more opportunities for learners to produce language, while still keeping input at the centre of the approach. The main innovations are: A greater focus on “manageable chunks”. Instead ...