Skip to main content

Should pupils give up doing French?

That's the title of a BBC web site article following the annual hand wringing as GSCE results show a continued decline in numbers of students taking languages. GCSE French numbers have fallen 45% in eight years, whilst German struggles even more and Spanish holds it own. (We shouldn't forget that there there are a good number of pupils doing other courses such as Asset languages.)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11086381

I would be curious to know where we stand compared to the 1970's, when only a minority of pupils did French to age 16. My hunch would be that more children are still learning up to 16, but that fewer are doing A-level as more and more options have been offered for less brilliant students.

Incidentally José Picardo has written a nice blog post on language learning and the class divide.

http://www.josepicardo.com/2010/08/the-languages-class-divide/

The two main factors involved in the decline are the government's decision to make languages optional at key Stage 4 and the relative difficulty of language learning compared to some other subjects where it is easier to achieve high grades. Schools have allowed their curriculum to be dictated by league tables rather than the eucational worth of a subject. They have also, realistically, accepted that many children find language learning too hard and are more motivated and less troublesome if they study other subjects.

Is language learning hard? Yes. It requires a good deal of concentration and memory. Is it fun? It often can be, more so than most other subject areas. Should all pupils do a language to age 16? No. Many waste their time despite our best efforts and we have to accept that motivation will be low in a country which speaks the world's lingua franca.

Paul Noble, quoted in the BBC piece, says that we need to make language learning more conversational and relevant. There is nothing new in this, but it is a rather naive response, since it ignores the fact that conversational competence hangs on grammatical skill and vocabulary knowledge. Conversational skill is the very hardest thing to master and many children prefer other skills.

The fact is that with the little time we allocate to language learning only a minority of quite able students will achieve much competence. Let's not pretend that initiatives at primary level will change the game to any degree either.

So what can we do?

How about addressing the severe grading issue in languages? French is about half a grade harder than most other subjects and a whole grade harder than a few. (Google "ALL severe grading" for chapter and verse on this.) Also, what about rewarding schools who enter more KS4 pupils for languages in the value added system? This would encourage head to place a greater emphasis on MFL. Sure, we need to keep reevaluating teaching methods and improving teachers. Universities may also wish to re-introduce the requirement to have a language at GCSE as an entry requirement (as UCL does). I would also broaden the curriculum at A-level, as had been the original intention with the 2000 reform. Five subjects at AS level instead of four would be a start. We lose lots of potentially good linguists at A-level as bright students choose maths and science.

Oh - and we should defend French. German has more speakers in Europe, but French is more widely used by Britons. Germans cope better in English than French people. Business in Europe still seeks French and German ahead of Spanish. How many of our students will work in the Americas? Mandarin is too hard for most and few of our youngsters will work in China.

Bonne rentrée!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…

The age factor in language learning

This post draws on a section from Chapter 5 of Jack C. Richards' splendid handbook Key Issues in Language Teaching (2015). I'm going to summarise what Richards writes about how age factors affect language learning, then add my own comments about how this might influence classroom teaching.

It's often said that children seem to learn languages so much more quickly and effectively than adults. Yet adults do have some advantages of their own, as we'll see.

In the 1970s it was theorised that children's success was down to the notion that there is a critical period for language learning (pre-puberty). Once learners pass this period changes in the brain make it harder to learn new languages. Many took this critical period hypothesis to mean that we should get children to start learning other languages at an earlier stage. (The claim is still picked up today by decision-makers arguing for the teaching of languages in primary schools.)

Unfortunately, large amounts of rese…

Dissecting a lesson: teaching an intermediate written text

This post is a beginner’s guide about how you might go about working with a written text with low-intermediate or intermediate students (Y10-11 in England). I must emphasise that this is not what you SHOULD do, just one approach based on my own experience and keeping in mind what we know about learning and language learning in particular. Experienced teachers may find it interesting to compare this sequence with what you do yourself.

You can adapt the sequence below to the class, context and your own preferred style. I’m going to assume that the text is chosen for relevance, interest and comprehensibility. The research suggests that the best texts are at the very least 90% understandable, i.e. you would need to gloss no more than 10% of the words or phrases. The text could be authentic, or more likely adapted authentic from a text book, or teacher written. It would likely be fairly short so you have time to exploit it intensively, recycling as much useful language as possible.

So here w…