Skip to main content

Review - Addressing Special Educational Needs and Disability in the Curriculum: MFL



It may not be the snappiest title for a handbook, but John Connor's book, in its second edition, is a very useful read for teachers interested in how to work with SEND students. Whatever the type of school you work in you are certain to encounter students with all sorts of special needs including hearing loss, dyslexia, dyspraxia, visual impairment, ADHD and physical disability. Until recently, if I had wanted to find out about SEND I would have consulted David Wilson's work at specialeducationalneeds.com or Hilary McColl's at at languageswithoutlimits.co.uk, but I can also thoroughly recommend John Connor's all-in-one reference book.

If you don't know John, as well as being a die-hard Everton football club supporter, he has been a Head of Faculty, a local authority adviser, senior examiner, an AST assessor and Ofsted inspector for MFL and SEN(D). The first edition of the book was part of a series "Meeting SEN in the Curriculum, which won a BERA (British Educational Resources Award). John tells me this new edition is much updated.

Running to around 140 pages of large clear print, half of which are in the form of appendices, the five general chapter headings are:

1. Meeting SEND: your responsibility (a reminder of basic statutory responsibilities).
2. The inclusive MFL classroom (including reasons for teaching MFL to SEND pupils, managing behaviour, individual case studies, supporting writing, using technology and producing your own materials).
3. Teaching and Learning (including types of differentiation, learning styles, a good practice guide, evalutaing materials, pair work and learning logs).
4. Monitoring and assessment (including formative assessment, formal assessment, feedback, individual support plans and accommodating individual needs.
5. Managing support (including working with teaching assistants, the care and support of individuals and groups and different ways of allocating time).

The appendices include legislation (including the SEND Code of Practice and the Equalities Act), how to develop a departmental policy, types of SEND, individual case studies and a couple of brief lesson plans for French and Spanish.

John's book is written in a very easy style which teachers will be able to relate to and learn from. His updates have included a reappraisal of the now much discredited learning styles theory, although I notice that he does refer to left and right brain learning, which I thought had also gone out of fashion. The list of types of special need and disability in the appendices is particularly useful, while his advice on MFL lessons includes a good deal of common sense about lesson planning, presenting language in different ways and easing the cognitive load by careful scaffolding. I'm not sure the two brief lesson plans at the end add a lot to the book, but some readers will no doubt find them useful.

The section on working with TAs is also extremely valuable and shows a good deal of experience about this very practical classroom issue. The reality of classrooms is brought to life by the case studies (individual teacher accounts) which sprinkle the text. Heads of Department will find the advice about writing policies invaluable. In the Monitoring and Assessment chapter there is great common sense advice about modelling and clarity of instruction including examples from Spanish and French.

John also gives a good range of examples of how to integrate technology in lessons and provides a list of useful references at the end of the book. I also liked his page (30) which lists examples of good "direct teaching"; directing, instructing, demonstrating, explaining and illustrating, questioning, discussing, consolidating, giving feedback and using plenaries. I like remarks such as "Give examples and remember to say the pupil's name before asking the question, to alert him and give him every chance of providing a good answer. Build in "thinking time", rather than expecting an immediate response."

If I were being fussy I'd say that the sequencing of ideas in the book comes across as just a little haphazard and some readers may appreciate even more detail, but there is no doubting the depth of knowledge, good sense and experience which John brings to his book. I also know from my own limited experience how these things work - publishers provide fairly strict word limits to write to, certainly for teachers who have limited time for extra reading. You could devour this excellent handbook in a long evening and learn a great deal.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

Five great advanced level French listening sites

If your A-level students would like opportunities to practise listening there are plenty of sources you can recommend for accessible, largely comprehensible and interesting material. Here are some I have come across while searching for resources over recent years.

Daily Geek Show

I love this site. It's fresh, youthful and full of really interesting material. They have an archive of videos, both short and long, from various sources, grouped under a range of themes: insolite (weird news items), science, discovery, technology, ecology and lifestyle. There should be something there to interest all your students while adding to their broader education. Here is one I enjoyed (I shall seriously think about buying tomatoes in winter now):




France Bienvenue

This site has been around for years and is the work of a university team in Marseilles. You get a mixture of audio and video material complete with transcripts and explanations.This is much more about the personal lives of the students …

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…