Skip to main content

Review - Addressing Special Educational Needs and Disability in the Curriculum: MFL

It may not be the snappiest title for a handbook, but John Connor's book, in its second edition, is a very useful read for teachers interested in how to work with SEND students. Whatever the type of school you work in you are certain to encounter students with all sorts of special needs including hearing loss, dyslexia, dyspraxia, visual impairment, ADHD and physical disability. Until recently, if I had wanted to find out about SEND I would have consulted David Wilson's work at or Hilary McColl's at at, but I can also thoroughly recommend John Connor's all-in-one reference book.

If you don't know John, as well as being a die-hard Everton football club supporter, he has been a Head of Faculty, a local authority adviser, senior examiner, an AST assessor and Ofsted inspector for MFL and SEN(D). The first edition of the book was part of a series "Meeting SEN in the Curriculum, which won a BERA (British Educational Resources Award). John tells me this new edition is much updated.

Running to around 140 pages of large clear print, half of which are in the form of appendices, the five general chapter headings are:

1. Meeting SEND: your responsibility (a reminder of basic statutory responsibilities).
2. The inclusive MFL classroom (including reasons for teaching MFL to SEND pupils, managing behaviour, individual case studies, supporting writing, using technology and producing your own materials).
3. Teaching and Learning (including types of differentiation, learning styles, a good practice guide, evalutaing materials, pair work and learning logs).
4. Monitoring and assessment (including formative assessment, formal assessment, feedback, individual support plans and accommodating individual needs.
5. Managing support (including working with teaching assistants, the care and support of individuals and groups and different ways of allocating time).

The appendices include legislation (including the SEND Code of Practice and the Equalities Act), how to develop a departmental policy, types of SEND, individual case studies and a couple of brief lesson plans for French and Spanish.

John's book is written in a very easy style which teachers will be able to relate to and learn from. His updates have included a reappraisal of the now much discredited learning styles theory, although I notice that he does refer to left and right brain learning, which I thought had also gone out of fashion. The list of types of special need and disability in the appendices is particularly useful, while his advice on MFL lessons includes a good deal of common sense about lesson planning, presenting language in different ways and easing the cognitive load by careful scaffolding. I'm not sure the two brief lesson plans at the end add a lot to the book, but some readers will no doubt find them useful.

The section on working with TAs is also extremely valuable and shows a good deal of experience about this very practical classroom issue. The reality of classrooms is brought to life by the case studies (individual teacher accounts) which sprinkle the text. Heads of Department will find the advice about writing policies invaluable. In the Monitoring and Assessment chapter there is great common sense advice about modelling and clarity of instruction including examples from Spanish and French.

John also gives a good range of examples of how to integrate technology in lessons and provides a list of useful references at the end of the book. I also liked his page (30) which lists examples of good "direct teaching"; directing, instructing, demonstrating, explaining and illustrating, questioning, discussing, consolidating, giving feedback and using plenaries. I like remarks such as "Give examples and remember to say the pupil's name before asking the question, to alert him and give him every chance of providing a good answer. Build in "thinking time", rather than expecting an immediate response."

If I were being fussy I'd say that the sequencing of ideas in the book comes across as just a little haphazard and some readers may appreciate even more detail, but there is no doubting the depth of knowledge, good sense and experience which John brings to his book. I also know from my own limited experience how these things work - publishers provide fairly strict word limits to write to, certainly for teachers who have limited time for extra reading. You could devour this excellent handbook in a long evening and learn a great deal.


Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…

The age factor in language learning

This post draws on a section from Chapter 5 of Jack C. Richards' splendid handbook Key Issues in Language Teaching (2015). I'm going to summarise what Richards writes about how age factors affect language learning, then add my own comments about how this might influence classroom teaching.

It's often said that children seem to learn languages so much more quickly and effectively than adults. Yet adults do have some advantages of their own, as we'll see.

In the 1970s it was theorised that children's success was down to the notion that there is a critical period for language learning (pre-puberty). Once learners pass this period changes in the brain make it harder to learn new languages. Many took this critical period hypothesis to mean that we should get children to start learning other languages at an earlier stage. (The claim is still picked up today by decision-makers arguing for the teaching of languages in primary schools.)

Unfortunately, large amounts of rese…

Dissecting a lesson: teaching an intermediate written text

This post is a beginner’s guide about how you might go about working with a written text with low-intermediate or intermediate students (Y10-11 in England). I must emphasise that this is not what you SHOULD do, just one approach based on my own experience and keeping in mind what we know about learning and language learning in particular. Experienced teachers may find it interesting to compare this sequence with what you do yourself.

You can adapt the sequence below to the class, context and your own preferred style. I’m going to assume that the text is chosen for relevance, interest and comprehensibility. The research suggests that the best texts are at the very least 90% understandable, i.e. you would need to gloss no more than 10% of the words or phrases. The text could be authentic, or more likely adapted authentic from a text book, or teacher written. It would likely be fairly short so you have time to exploit it intensively, recycling as much useful language as possible.

So here w…