Skip to main content

The topic of diversity in the A-Level MFL syllabuses

At this fraught moment, with racism raising its ugly head yet again, educators are being challenged to tackle the issue. I thought it might be worth recalling that the A-level syllabuses in modern languages have an honourable record when it comes to dealing with issues such as diversity, immigration and integration. 

I always thought that the exam boards (and in recent times Ofqual) took an enlightened approach to their choice of curriculum content. In the distant past the developing world featured. The environment has, until recently, been a staple topic. Diversity, immigration, integration and racism have also been in the specs for years. I was always happy with this and I believe my students enjoyed listening, reading and talking about these issues. In a subject like ours it seems only right that we should be educating students about such matters and fostering attitudes of understanding and tolerance (in the best sense of that word).

That said, I have occasionally read or heard of language teachers who grumble at the fact that A-level covers the same old "tired topics", whether it be environment, poverty, crime or diversity. Teachers who express this view may feel we have over-indulged in politically correct themes, bordering on indoctrination. I hope you agree with me that that’s nonsense.

To digress for a moment, like many other teachers, I was disappointed to see the environment disappear from A-level in 2016. This was only partly the fault of the awarding bodies, in fact, since Ofqual/DfE imposed limitations regarding what topics could be covered. The exam boards felt that the environment could not be shoe-horned into the requirements of AO4 (target language country-specific topics - even though AQA did put the sub-theme of cyber-society into the French specification, which is a challenge to relate specifically to France and French-speaking countries.)

So back to my main point, today’s A-level specifications feature strongly issues which are relevant to today’s discussions and demonstrations about racism.

Here is a glimpse of what the awarding bodies include in the A-level French courses, as copied from the specs:

AQA

Positive features of a diverse society (Les aspects positifs d'une société diverse)
  • L'enrichissement dû à la mixité ethnique
  • Diversité, tolérance et respect 
  • Diversité – un apprentissage pour la vie

Pearson/ Edexcel

Theme 3: L’immigration et la société multiculturelle française. Theme 3 is set in the context of France only. This theme covers social issues and trends.
  • L’impact positifdel’immigration sur lasociété française
  • Les contributions des immigrés à l’économie et à la culture.
  • Répondre aux défis de l’immigration et de l’intégration en France
  • Les activités des communautés; la marginalisation et l’aliénation du point de vue des immigrés.
  • L’extrême droite
  • La montée du Front National (sic); les leaders du Front National; l’opinion publique.

Eduqas 
  • Diversity and difference
  • Migration and integration
  • Reasons for migration; factors which make migration/integration easy/difficult
  • Cultural identity and marginalisation
  • Reasons for marginalisation; ways to eliminate marginalisation
  • Cultural enrichment and celebrating difference
  • The positive aspects of a diverse society
  • Discrimination and diversity
  • Life for those who are discriminated against
Then, of course, we need to keep in mind the books and films chosen by the exam boards, which also occasionally get into issues like diversity.

So I don’t think the awarding bodies need feel any guilt about their commitment to these worthy issues - at least as far as A-Level is concerned. The same is not true of GCSE where I think there may be scope for something more. I know there are teachers out there who would like to see less about topics such as holidays, healthy living and the like, and some more meaty topics relating specifically to the TL culture. If anyone still has that sneaking suspicion that the inclusion of diversity and racism is somehow too political, then we’ll have to agree to disagree. I think it’s through educating young people to value diversity that we reduce the likelihood of stupid and dangerous talk and behaviour in the future and help develop responsible, educated citizens.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more