Skip to main content

Who's coming to dinner?

I am grateful to Florencia Henshaw for reminding me in a recent webinar she took part in with Joe Dale of this communicative task, which is a variation on the classic balloon debate. You might be able to come up with other variations or twists. Below is how I describe it (taken from a document on frenchteacher.net). The task is really aimed at advanced level students, but might work with very high-performing GCSE students (CEFR level A2/B1).

Do go and check out Florencia's YouTube channel, by the way. Here is the link to the webinar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnOxZrQ3Oko&t=3065s

Remember that a key aspect of this type of task is to create a need to communicate and collaborate, to use language for a purpose and prioritise meaning over focus on accurate form. As a teacher, therefore, your role would be to offer support, help with vocabulary and grammar where requested, and provide correction only where error seriously hampers meaning.

Who’s coming to dinner?

This is a collaborative task where students have to decide who they wish to invite to a dinner party.

Carried out in groups of about four or five, depending on the size of your class.

Instructions

Each student must, without conferring, choose three people they would like to invite to dinner. They can use any criteria they wish. They write down notes or a paragraph justifying why they have chosen each of their three people.

 

Model to show students (French)

J’ai choisi David Attenborough, qui présente des documentaires sur les animaux, les plantes et la protection de l’environnement. Je l’ai invité parce que je pense qu’il aurait des histoires remarquables à raconter et parce que je le trouve très sympathique. En plus le changement climatique et l’environnement sont des sujets auxquels je m’intéresse beaucoup.

 

After about ten minutes, each group member should present the case for each of their chosen dinner guests.

Then the group must collaborate and decide between them which three people they wish to invite. Once the decision is made, one member, with help from friends, presents their choice to the class and the teacher.

 

Language to display (French example)

To provide some scaffolding for the task you could display the language below.

On devrait inviter – we should invite                          Je suis d’accord – I agree

Je ne suis pas d’accord – I don’t agree                      Le problème, c’est que - the problem is

Mon choix est meilleur – my choice is better             Si nous invitions – (what) if we invited

Il/Elle serait – He/She would be                                 J’aurais du mal à - I’d have a problem

Je m’entends mal avec – I get on badly with             Ce qui m’inquiète – what worries me

J’ai peur que (+ subjonctif) – I fear that                      Il me semble que – it seems to me that

           

Twist

You could give each group member an imaginary identity. The imaginary person could have some personality characteristics, political views, prejudices etc. Provide each student with a card describing the imaginary person.

Example card details

Name: Paul Leblanc

Age: 40

Job: computer analyst

Interests: film, computer games, historical novels, travel

Political views: conservative, anti EU, anti immigration

Favourite people from history: Winston Churchill, Marie Curie, Alan Turing


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more