Skip to main content

Independent learning in MFL

I must admit that I have never got my head around "independent learning" when it comes to language learning. As a Head of Department I was encouraged, along with other departments and teachers, to incorporate as much independent learning as possible in lessons. An underlying assumption, I assume, was that students would be less bored when working on their own, more challenged and that knowledge and skills acquired in this fashion would be better embedded.

Trouble is, language teachers know that to get their pupils to acquire language successfully they need to supply lots of language input which means talking to them, asking them questions, playing them CDs or videos. This is the best quality listening input, although we are, for very good reasons, happy to let them work in pairs and groups when the quality of input will be less good.

All this listening means it is harder for the language teacher to create the conditions for independent learning, unless we just mean that the student can control the pace and nature of the input via a listening station or computer. Even this is a little problematic, because language teachers also know that they need to select and grade the language they release to students.

Now, reading is a different matter, as it is possible to set up independent, if guided, reading schemes. You just need the right kind of graded material and this is not easy to source. The old favourite Bibliobus was a good example of useful reading where pupils could go at their own pace and, in a sense, work independently.

What about "project work" using the mother tongue? Alright if your aim is cultural rather than linguistic, but time is limited, too limited, so we have to prioritise practice in the target language.

When it comes down to it, language teaching, to work well, needs to be teacher-led and instructional in the best sense. We are not talking note-taking here, we are talking structured practice, question-answer, drilling, repetition, game playing, singing and the rest. This is why the charismatic, "all singing, all dancing" style often works well and this is what makes language learning demanding and enjoyable both for teacher and student.

My own experience, and maybe a consequence of my own failings, was that students liked and needed to be led, and became unsettled when they they were left too much to their own devices. Homework was the best opportunity to work alone and this was when lots of great, "independent" work was produced.

We want students to become independent users of the language, but paradoxically giving too much independence is not the best way to achieve it.

Do you agree?


Comments

  1. It is such a joyful pleasure to hear a voice like this. Over the past years, there has been a clear dogmatism (from where...?) about how languages should be taught. Firstly, the dogma of target language. Yes! It can work, in certain circumstances but to then apply that across all abilities / both genders has alienated so many students. And now, independent learning is our new church. Yes, it has its place. Yes, in a well-structured classroom it will work; but we are now at the point whereby an OFSTED judgement will de facto assume 'independent learning' as criterion for 'outstanding'. I would like to know how much 'independent learning' takes place in, say, music lessons....??!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow - surely what we've all been thinking, but keeping quiet about when we hear what Ofsted want to see. We're talking PLTs and collaborative learning but I know very well how I manage to get my students their A*s in Spanish... by teacher led lessons all the way!!! I am clearly pushing the idea of phonics and dictionary skills so that students can be more independent - but I am also aware that when I let students loose to work on their own - some will and a lot won't... Thanks for making so much sense!It's so good to read your comments!
    Jane Croft

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm glad I'm not the only person who thinks this! As regards Ofsted, my impression is happy for teachers to lead lessons as long as they don't talk too much. I'm sure they like to see some pair or group work and not too much note-taking. But there IS an issue - as I say, we need to talk a good deal to supply the comprehensible input.

    I suspect also that teacher talk, if it's good, is preferable to children than the CD. I blogged a while ago about how babies are thought to acquire phonological patterns more quickly when they hear the human voice rather than a recording. Maybe the same is true for odler learners. Hard to prove, though.

    Thanks for your comments.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Totally agree. I was asked once where the independent learning in my observed lesson was. I responded there was little or no time for such learning as pupils needed vast input in order to be able to have output. I said that this is what homework was for. I do think however that we can teach our pupils independent learning techniques by teaching them how to use dictionaries properly, use verb tables and their own notes.

    On a lighter note I get all pupils to hold a dictionary and say: This is a lethal weapon. Used badly it will cause lasting damage! This approach has helped pupils to be better independent thinkers when trying to express themselves in own choice of words.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you a 100%! This is such an interesting discussion. Independent learning occurs outside of the classroom, but inside there needs to be an input-output exchange. Maybe I'm too old school. But old enough to realize that these dogmas are fads, like the reign of the communicative approach, the ban on mother tongue etc.
    You can't teach a language the same way you teach geography or math.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fortunately I think we are in a "post methods" era where we accept that an eclectic approach to language teaching is needed and where emthods may vary depending on context. A school classroom is not the same as an adult immersion context, for example.

    I would say the communicative approach (depending what is menat by that term) has brought a lot of benefits and that we are in a better place than thirty years ago.

    Thanks for the comment, Marie.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Since language is, by definition, interactive, there has to be a limit to how much can be learned "independently". Helping students to become autonomous is another thing. As for an observer wanting to see "independent learning", I'd suggest that the best place for that is in the student's home.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And being autonomous has always meant me to have some internalised grammar and vocabulary from which pupils can produce original utterances. Only some pupils reach this stage because of lack of time, motivation or sometimes lack of teacher skill.

    Thanks for commenting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.

Attitudes16





An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at dolanguages.com, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…