Skip to main content

In defence of pictures

I had an interesting exchange the other morning on Twitter on the subject of using pictures in modern language lessons. A fellow teacher, Barry Smith, was arguing strongly against the use of pictures, when, in his view, we should be making more use of English to present vocabulary if it is more effective to do so. Barry is not alone in arguing that knowledge of the mother tongue is the biggest advantage second language learners have and that we should not shy away from it for dogmatic methodological reasons. TPRS practitioners are happy to use L1 when presenting new vocabulary and some applied linguists, for example, Wolfgang Butzkamm, have made the same point strongly, for instance here.

Among the arguments Barry listed:
  •  Pictures are patronising - we wouldn't use them with adult learners
  • Translations are clearer than pictures
  • English is in children's minds anyway, so do not shy away from using it
  • Pictures demand too much use of memory which can be threatening - use written words to support listening as much as possible
  • Showing words develops literacy in both languages
  • Showing words enables pupils to see morphological patterns in both languages
  • Creating pictures is a poor use of teacher time - it's inefficient
Barry is right to question the orthodoxy of language teaching. We do need to stop and consider whether our methods are the best.

One of the first course books in the UK to use pictures to any significant degree (beyond pure decoration) was Mark Gilbert's Cours Illustré de Français (1966) which used stick men drawings and simple black and white illustrations of everyday life. The pictures had a purpose and were part of a methodology, the so-called oral situational approach, a kind of structured direct method. The pictures were used as a stimulus for question and answer oral work where the aim was to avoid English as much as possible. Language would be presented orally first, with the written word being introduced at a later stage. Every attempt would be made to explain and demonstrate meaning and structure in the target language. Learning L2 becomes, therefore, something like learning L1 - the classic argument of those who support so-called natural language learning approaches.

This became the orthodoxy which many teachers and some applied linguists have challenged. Why avoid English at all cost? Why not take advantage of what the child knows from their own language if it is quicker and more effective to do so? Why make children suffer with endless target language which often confuses, threatens and subsequently fails?

The criticism needs to be met head-on.

If we use L1 more we may get a quicker immediate understanding of the language, but we lose so much. The process of using TL as much as possible, as long as it is handled in a sensible, structured way, using gesture, pictures, realia and texts, provides the large amount of "comprehensible input" which most applied linguists would argue brings about long term acquisition and internalisation of vocabulary and syntax.

Images, in particular, are an extremely effective way of avoiding the interference of English. (Opponents argue that English does not interfere, it helps.) They can be motivational, suggestive and amusing. Crucially, they attract the eye and help hold attention. They are not patronising at all if you know why you are using them (and maybe explain to classes why you are using them).

In addition, pictures can provide useful cultural input. Like video, they can bring a bit of the traget language culture into the classroom.

Fundamentally, though, they are an important part of a tried and tested method. Opponents argue that results show these methods do not work. I argue, on the contrary, that if pupils get little success in language learning, it is down to other factors such as the general motivation of English speakers, lack of time and frequency of teacher contact, or just poor use of the methodology by teachers.

Yet I would not argue for a total avoidance of L1 in the classroom. Flexibility is needed. When explaining a complex pair or group work task it is often more efficient to give a brief explanation in English rather than a laboured one in the TL. Translating can be convenient, a change, a good challenge. Children appreciate clarity, so if you are losing the class, something has gone awry. Furthermore, learners and teachers vary and may respond in different ways. But if we overuse the first language, there will be a cost in terms of long term improvement in comprehension and fluency.

Comments

  1. In addition, a picture can say so much more than many words. Why describe a yellow French post box or a Spanish market in English when you can show a picture? Essential to the promotion of Intercultural Understanding, in my opinion. It may take a while to find pictures the first time you use them, but you can use them many times. They become a shorthand for the teacher, and learners can also use them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good points. I'm not sure whether Barry would disagree on that. Maybe he was getting at simple representations of everyday objects or, for example, emotions. Interestingly the TPRS teachers like to present vocab initially as bilingual lists. I get that, but still feel pictures are more attention-grabbing. Thanks for th comment, Clare.
    PS Off to Bournemouth this weekend for the big SING barbershop event.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think we need to constantly evaluate impact when using pictures. When introducing simple vocabulary-especially cognates-they can just be distracting.
    I disagree that pictures would not be used with adults-used as a stimulus pictures are great to develop cultural awareness and some of the clues are more likely to be picked up by adult learners.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the comment, Isabelle. I take your first point, though still slightly balk at the idea of using English rather than other stimuli. Old habits die hard! Yes, pictures may be distracting, but they also hold attention and the best ones are not gimmicky - stick figures and simple representations of objects are fine. Flashcards and slides still offer all kinds of useful classroom possibilities.

    Totally agree on your second point.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As a native speaker of French, having spent my entire school life until the age of 17 in France, I can confirm that I studied Latin, French, English, German and Spanish successfully. Not wanting to declare my age on here, but in the 80s, no sign of any IWB, no internet, no Power Points, no apps and NO pictures. The first time I got exposed to a flashcard was when I started my teacher training here in the UK. I learnt my French grammar and conjugations through practice, memorisation, dictations, poetry, books, I used a pen, I underlined everything I was asked to. If I had spent my English lessons looking at pictures of fish and chips, I am not so sure I would have understood my preterit. I did it through memorisation, tests, spellings, chanting until I knew it. I still cannot figure out how a picture of David Beckham and parrot repetitions in the style of ' je l'aime bien' is going to help my students remember the position of the DOP in a French sentence. The only way they remember it is by telling them what my sentence sounds and looks like in English. The only way to get them to do a translation successfully from French into English is to make them look at patterns, is to make them understand that we read a full sentence before we tackle the issues. Where do pictures fit in ? Instead of spending hours researching for the best picture of a goldfish, am I not better off thinking about what I want the students to do and especially about what are they going to find difficult ? In terms of pronunciation? in terms of sounds/ spellings ? I have returned to good old fashioned methods for the last three years now and since then my department's results have improved massively. No pictures= accuracy. No pictures= freedom to teach more difficult grammatical aspects earlier. If someone has a good idea about how to teach the subjunctive with pictures, please send them to me. I am a bit of a Grammar Queen, but I love it. I believe in it, I believe in time spent on spellings ( and in English too, as I am sick of marking GCSE papers where answers have to be in English and students do not score because they cannot spell in English !!! ), I believe in direct translations from English. In our French partner school, teachers teach. Most of their MFL rooms do not have an IWB. They have a passionate teacher, an expert, a linguist who has the courage to stand at the front and has the courage to be the picture. Now that's a good picture isn't it ?

    From an old fashioned but happy, passionate and proud MFL teacher.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for leaving a comment. The methods you are espousing may work for some children. Pictures for teaching the subjunctive? Maybe not. Nobody would argue for pictures to teach everything. Your analytical approach is likely to produce good grammarians and, in the long run, it may be good for developing listening and speaking skills if you can provide plenty of good listening and speaking practice too. I do not believe your approach is the best for most children. We know that because we have seen it fail in the past. Grammar-translation only ever worked for a small minority of interested pupils.Many children would find it too boring.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.

Attitudes16





An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at dolanguages.com, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…