Skip to main content

Five blogs I like

On frenchteacher.net I have a long list of French teacher blog links, but I don't have the time to visit them all, apart from checking that the links have not gone dead. The languages blogs I like to read most, though, are ones related to language teaching pedagogy. I have maintained an interest in this over the years ever since my linguistics study at university and the MA I did later (partly on the work of Stephen Krashen). But there are other education blogs I like to read too. Here are five blogs I would recommend:


  • The Language Gym blog by Gianfranco Conti is unusual in combining detailed reference to research with practical implications for the classroom. It's a relatively new blog, but Gianfranco, who teaches French in Kuala Lumpur, is a frenetic blogger who always makes you think without trying to sell one particular approach over another. Young teachers could learn a good deal from his posts which are detailed and referenced. Gianfranco really gets into the nitty-gritty of "what works". He also runs a free interactive website called The Language Gym with a focus on language manipulation.


  • Musicuentos ("inspiring passion and proficiency in world language teaching") is another website and blog from America with the focus firmly on second language teaching methodology. I have belatedly discovered this one and can recommend, in particular, the series of videocasts recently published and which focus on aspects of research and methodology. The curator is Sarah-Elizabeth Cottrell, a Spanish teacher with a strong background in second language acquisition theory and research and who seems to have an eclectic view of what might work. Sarah is active on Twitter and sometimes hosts #langchat question-answer chats.


  • Barry Smith's occasional blogs are good fun. Barry enjoys taking aim at what he sees as fashionable but ineffective practices in the modern languages classroom. He teaches French at the new Michaela Community School in London. Michaela has made a bit of a name for itself during its short existence. It is known as a school with outstandingly well-behaved children, a strong focus on traditional knowledge and a rejection of a lot of the bureaucracy and box-ticking activities which go on in so many British schools. Barry's approach to French teaching is quite original and his pupils (Barry would never call them students) seem to love it. He likes dictating and translating but hates pictures.


  • Tom Bennett writes a blog for the TES. Tom recently became the leader of an advisory group on behaviour for the DfE. Tom, whose background is English teaching, is well known in the twittersphere for his amusing tweets, huge, old-school common sense about classroom behaviour and very entertaining writing. He has also taken the lead in establishing the popular ResearchEd conferences which seem to be sprouting up all over the world. I always enjoy his posts about education.


  • My final one is more of a resource site than a blog. It's called Douce France and is run by an Irish teacher of French Conan Hamill. Conan regularly posts a French text he has written, along with a link to a radio broadcast of topical interest. He includes questions for his students to work on. Recent topics have included: same sex marriage (to accompany the recent referendum in Ireland), Jean-Marie Le Pen, the Eurovision song contest and the Charlie Hebdo events. I don't know how well known Douce France is, but it's great that Conan shares his work with the world.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics