Skip to main content

La SNCF expérimente un passe Navigo sur clé USB

Voilà une bonne idée. En France on n'a pas de pétrole, mais on a des idées.

Yahoo.fr

"Un nouveau passe Navigo serait-il sur les rails ? Le Syndicat des transports d'Ile-de-France (Stif) et Transilien SNCF lancent une expérimentation auprès de mille usagers volontaires. Ceux-ci vont être dotés d'une clé USB de 1 Go peu ordinaire. Elle leur permettra non seulement de franchir les portiques du RER (la clé comporte une puce sans contact, comme le passe Navigo), mais aussi de recharger leur forfait mensuel ou hebdomadaire par Internet. 

D'ordinaire à chaque début de mois, les usagers des transports parisiens doivent faire d'interminables queues aux guichets de la SNCF ou de la RATP pour recharger leur forfait. Les clients testeurs pourront acheter directement leur titre depuis le site transilien.com en branchant leur clé sur le port USB de leur ordinateur et en réglant par carte bancaire. Même si l'opération est menée par la SNCF, les utilisateurs pourront acheter des forfaits concernant uniquement les zones 1 et 2, correspondant à Paris. Autrement dit, principalement aux lignes de métro de la RATP. Chaque clé est à usage personnel et comporte au verso une photo de son propriétaire. « Nous avons commencé à recruter les utilisateurs en envoyant en opt-in à 25 000 de nos clients un e-mail pour leur proposer de faire partie de cette expérience. La semaine passée nous comptions déjà 500 retours positifs. Notre panel est aujourd'hui presque complet. Nous avons présélectionné des personnes qui répondent au cahier des charges : à savoir des utilisateurs qui partent d'une gare avec portillon, sans portillon, etc. », développe un porte-parole du Transilien SNCF.

L'expérimentation se terminera le 31 août prochain. Elle viendra compléter celle menée par la RATP et le Transilien SNCF sur un autre mode de paiement : le lecteur à carte. Les usagers volontaires y insèrent leur passe Navigo pour recharger leur forfait depuis Internet. A l'issue de ces deux tests, le Stif rendra ses conclusions. « Il s'agira de savoir quelle expérience a rencontré l'adhésion des utilisateurs. Et d'établir un modèle économique. La clé sera-t-elle donnée comme le passe Navigo ? Les usagers devront-ils en payer une partie ? Et s'il y a une participation viendra-t-elle du Stif, des transporteurs ? », explique la SNCF. Le passe Navigo compte déjà plus de 1,6 million d'utilisateurs. Il est peu probable pour des raisons économiques que le Stif décide de rééquiper tous ces usagers. La clé USB, si elle est retenue, pourrait donc venir comme carte de transport alternative."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is "Input Processing"?

Input Processing (IP) was proposed by Bill VanPatten, Professor of Spanish and Second Language Acquisition from Michigan State University. Bill may be known to some of you from his podcast show Tea with BVP. He is one of those rare university academics who makes a specific effort to engage with practising teachers. IP was first proposed in a 1993 article (published with T. Cadierno in the Modern Language Journal) entitled "Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction." My summary of it is based on an article "Input Processing and Processing Instruction: Definitions and Issues" (2013) by Hossein Hashemnezhad. IP is a little complicated to explain, but I'll do my best to summarise the key points before suggesting how it relates to other ways of looking at classroom language teaching. Is this actually any use to teachers? I apologise in advance for over-simplifying or misunderstanding. To paraphrase Dr Leonard McCoy from Star Trek &q

Delayed dictation

Image: pixabay.com What is “delayed dictation”? Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music. It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too. Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating. In our language teaching case, though, the

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table. To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document. Dans ma ville (in my town) Dans ma région (In my area) il y a (there is/are) des banques (banks) des cafés (cafes) des

Pros and cons of pair and group work

Most teachers have made frequent use of pair and group work for many years, notably since the rise of communicative language teaching in the 1980s. Even before then it would have been common for pupils to work in pairs on simple role-play and dialogue tasks. So pair and group work is standard practice, if not universally supported by language teachers. It’s always worth evaluating, however, whether a practice works - whether, in this case, it helps students develop their proficiency. Pros Rod Ellis (2005) summarises the advantages of pair/group work (based on Jacobs, 1998) “1. The quantity of learner speech can increase. In teacher-fronted classrooms, the teacher typically speaks 80% of the time; in groupwork more students talk for more of the time. 2. The variety of speech acts can increase. In teacher-fronted classrooms, students are cast in a responsive role, but in groupwork they can perform a wide range of roles, including those involved in the negotiation of meaning. 3. There can