Skip to main content

Frenchteacher survey results



Every few months I carry our a Surveymonkey survey of my subscribers to check on which parts of the site are being used most and to get feedback, including ideas for improving the site. Thank you to the 98 respondents (out of around 1450 subscribers). Here are the the questions and the responses:

1.  Which sections of the site do you use most; A-level, GCSE or KS3?

Just over 53% said A-level, 37% said GCSE and 9% said KS3. Compared with previous surveys I see that rather more subscribers seem to be using the GCSE and KS3 sections. This may be because I have made a conscious attempt for the site not to be seen as for A-level only. Although I keep adding new A-level resources, I have made a particular attempt to beef up the KS3 section with PowerPoints and other resources.

2. Do you make regular or occasional use of the KS3 PowerPoints?

35% said yes. I'm pleased that these newer additions are being used. I have written a lot of largely vocab-based presentations, including Kim's Game PowerPoints. I think it's easy to overuse PowerPoints, but exploited cleverly they allow for lots of recycling of language in an interactive way, often beyond the isolated word level too. I always recommend pixabay.com for pictures. For me they are great because they are free to use even commercially.

3.  Have you ever used the "instant listening tasks" in the Y10-11 section?

39% said yes. I wrote these to try to cater for teachers who are seeking more easy to implement listening activities, both at Higher and Foundation Tier. Do check them out if you've missed them up to now. The can be read aloud or recorded if you prefer.

4.  Do you make use of the video listening tasks at GCSE?

55% said yes. From previous feedback I know these are popular, particularly the cartoon videos such as Peppa Pig and Petit Ours Brun. I recently blogged about the advantages of using these as a source of enjoyable authentic input. In response to one respondent I have been through all the sheets and updated some of the links which had gone dead or been moved. Do let me know of any more if they occur.

5.  Do you make use of the grammar drill exercises from Y7 to Y11?

79% said yes. It looks like old-school audio-lingual and other grammar drills remain popular. I haven't added to these in a while. Let me know if you would like more for particular areas.

6.  Do you make use of the resources written specifically for A-level exam preparation?

68% said yes. These resources include vocab booklets, speaking booklets, stimulus cards, translations and summaries. One respondent asked if I could do more on literature and film, but I am afraid I cannot devote the large amount of time to a specific work which would only benefit a small number of subscribers. Another asked for something on Les Choristes. I could do no better than the excellent resources written by Steve Glover on his dolanguages site anyway.

7.  Do you ever adapt or edit resources you download?

75% said yes. This is fine and written into the terms and conditions of the site. I am quite happy with this as long as they are nor shared with other schools or resold elsewhere! This alas happens to some resource writers. I occasionally see my own resources appear online in another guise. I would just like a credit if they are occasionally shared free by accident.

8.  Are you a primary teacher?

2% (2 people) said yes. My Y7 page is actually labelled Year7/Primary as I know many of the resources would work with Y5 or 6. I have never seriously tried to market my site to primary schools, given the array of other free resources out there, e.g. Clare Seccombe's resources at Light Bulb Languages. Given the low cost of my site I do think more primary practitioners would get good use out of the resources, even though I am not a primary specialist.

9.  Do you teach outside England and Wales?

16% said yes. I am aware that I have subscribers all over the world, including in international schools following a British curriculum. One Irish respondent reminded me that there is nothing specifically aimed at the Leaving Certificate. While I presume many of the A-level resources would be useful, I shall look at that issue and see what I can do.

10.  Do you have any other feedback or ideas?

One respondent requested materials specifically for pre-U. I shall look at this.
One asked for WJEC film and literature resources. As I mentioned above, I won't be doing anything on this. I assume the Eduqas resources written by Steve Glover would fit the bill in that case.
One Scottish respondent asked if I could label the site more clearly since terms like KS3 and GCSE are not used in Scotland. I'll look at this again, though I do use the terms Beginner and Intermediate as well.
  • One teacher asked for more lower ability resources for GCSE. This has been mentioned before. When I set up the site i uploaded worksheets aimed at my grammar school pupils. I have tried to add more easier material (e.g. the easy listenings) , but I agree that there could be more. Watch this space.
  • One teacher requested role-play scripts for KS3. I have moved a whole bunch of these across from my Adults page in case they have been missed.
  • One teacher requested more translations at all levels. I shall (begrudgingly!) continue to add more guided translations. Some of you know I'm not a huge fan of translation, but I know most teachers like them.
  • One teacher asked for more morphology exercises on the A-level page. Noted.
  • One asked for more dates of articles so that students could be sure data was accurate. (Apart form the year I deliberately keep things a little vague to ensure some shelf life for the resources. As far as I know, though, all the information is accurate and newer resources have focused more on cultural information (AO4 in A-level-speak). 
  • One person asked for something on a media topic for Y8 (near beginner). Noted.
  • One teacher asked for more war/occupation/resistance materials. I have already added one new resource on this, but will look for more.
  • Two people commented on the sheer size of the site and the time it takes to locate resources. I am aware of this, although to be fair most people have previously reported that navigating the site is fine. I will soon need to do some more weeding. In addition, I deliberately do not label materials by exam board, since there is a good deal of overlap and different wording of topics depending on the board. I won't be changing this approach. Whetehr you use AQA, Edexcel or Eduqas/WJEC you should be able to find what you need easily enough. I tested the search box and it does work (ne person said it didn't).
  • Lastly, one person requested some more literary extracts for KS3. That's a tough one for copyright reasons and the fact they are nearly all too hard for KS3 (and mostly GCSE too for that matter). the ones the exam board use are old and hugely adapted. I always thought it was a daft idea to force these into the exam. I bet the exam boards feel the same way.

Finally.... thank you for the many appreciative comments you left me. These help me maintain my enthusiasm for the site, as does the fact that many teachers come back year-on-year to subscribe. I do make some additions to the site based on feedback. Merci infiniment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g