Skip to main content

Plans for 2019

I consider myself very fortunate in my semi-retirement. In particular I get to spend lots of time with my wife travelling around the world. 2018 saw us in our French house in Charente Maritime for about 10 weeks, Ireland, the Netherlands, Canada, Florida and Mauritius. Our train trip across Canada from Toronto to Vancouver was a highlight. This year we have trips to Guadeloupe, Florida, Costa Rica, France and (maybe) Japan lined up.

In between our travels and my other pastimes, I still enjoy contributing to the world of modern language teaching. Last year I was pleased to present at MFL Alive in Ireland, take part in a podcast with American linguist Stacey Margarita, present a webinar for the Chartered College of Teaching, while presenting for AQA on A-level French and running three days for the trainee teachers at the University of Buckingham. My book Becoming an Outstanding Languages Teacher (2017) has sold well, receiving excellent reviews, while The Language Teacher Toolkit (2016) continues to sell in large numbers around the world.

In 2019 I’ll be continuing to work with the PGCE and IPGCE students at Buckingham in February and May. I’ll be doing very occasional school CPD visits, either on my own behalf, or for AQA. I’ll be starting with a visit to Walsall on January 10th to lead a session on teaching grammar, with later sessions in Cambridgeshire and Portsmouth. In addition I’ll be presenting st Language Worldon March 22nd in Loughborough. My topic will be interpetsonal and task-based listening. If you want to book me, just ask and I’ll look at my diary. I don’t make my living out of running CPD, but sometimes say yes if I’m free and the job appeals to me. Mainly I enjoy being a teacher again, working with other teachers and talking about our craft.

Most excitingly, sometime in the spring Gianfranco and I are intending to self-publish our second book together. This one, called Breaking the Sound Barrier, is about teaching listening skills in the classroom. We are well ahead with the text and should end up with 200 pages of practical advice and activities, strongly rooted in Gianfranco’s “Listening As Modelling” approach. In reality, the bulk of the material will consist of specific tasks aimed at beginner and intermediate pupils. There is nothing else out there which so specifically looks at listening in MFL classrooms (rather than, say, EFL). Look out for more news on this soon.

I’ll be keeping frenchteacher.net fresh, of course. There currently over 1700 resources on the site and expect to see plenty of new additions at every level. Last year I built up a decent set of PowerPoints and sentence builder frames, while continuing to enhance all the textual and video material for GCSE and A-level. If you’d like me to. write any particular resources just get in touch and I’ll give it consideration.

Expect to see plenty of blog posts too this year. In 2018 I was a little less prolific than usual with around 100 posts and I often think I’ll run out of things to write about, then another set of thoughts come to mind! I’m open to guest posts too, so once again let me know if you have something to share but don’t have your own platform. Expect to see plenty of language teaching related tweets and Facebook posts. I’m most active on the GILT group, which now has its own Twitter feed. Check it out at @GILT_ FB.

In the meantime, thanks for reading and I wish you a Happy MFL New Year!

PS Let’s hope Brexit never happens and Trump resigns.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g