Skip to main content

Breaking the Sound Barrier: Teaching Language Learners How to Listen

I'm pleased to let you know that the book Gianfranco Conti and I have written is now published. The book is called Breaking the Sound Barrier: Teaching Language Learners How to Listen and is available from Amazon. It will be available from other outlets in due course. As with The Language Teacher Toolkit, the formula combines research and practical classroom activities. In this case well over 200 separate classroom tasks with a focus on building listening skills.

Gianfranco and I have both felt for many years that listening is the most neglected skill in many language classrooms. Listening is as natural as walking and talking for humans and should, we believe, be an integral part of every teacher's curriculum plan. Far from being a passive skill, it involves complex mental processes and skills which can be deliberately developed and practised. Having both read John Field's seminal work Teaching Listening in the Languages Classroom (2008) we decided we could marry the principles of that book with more practical classroom implementation, especially for modern language teachers. No other book has done this. For over a year we have been reading as much as possible, assembling ideas, writing, proofing and editing. My wife Elspeth Jones acted as proof-reader, editor and formatter, ensuring the text makes sense for our intended readership. This is not intended primarily as a scholarly work for academic researchers, but as a handbook for teachers written by teachers.

John Field believes, along with other writers, that to teach listening better we need to break down what the skill consists of into "micro-skills", then design tasks which develop each of these skills, in order to make students feel much more confident about the process. So it's about breaking listening down and building it up again. Traditionally, listening is a classroom activity which pupils don't enjoy that much. "Is this a test?" they often say. It frequently makes them anxious, and overly hard exam listening tests don't help. In addition, text books tend to focus on comprehension exercises which often encourage superficial listening and a degree of guesswork. So the emphasis is on correct answers, or. as Field puts it, product not process. Pupils do an exercise, get a mark and move on, without being able to carefully process the language, in essence working on listening in enough detail. So our book moves away from a comprehension model of listening, to a process model.

Our book examines the micro-skills John Field describes, e.g. phonological decoding, lexical retrieval, grammatical parsing and meaning making. We then describe many activities which help develop these micro-skills. There are separate chapters therefore on phonology/phonics, lexical retrieval and using grammatical knowledge to make meaning. Anxious for the book to be balanced, we describe some more mainstream communicative activities and tasks which put the emphasis on listening. So there are chapters entitles Interpersonal listening and Task-based listening, along side those focusing on sounds, lexis and grammar.

Furthermore we examine the issue of using strategies to help with the listening process, as well assessment issues. There are also two chapters which look in detail how activities of the book can be applied in actual lesson sequences and when applied to using songs. Our final chapter suggests how language departments might go about developing their focus on listening. Chapters usually begin with some research background, followed by clearly described numerous classroom tasks. Examples are in English, French, Spanish, German and Italian. All are adaptable to any language.

When putting together the index of the book, it was interesting to see which words and phrases came up most. "Comprehensible input" featured most often, and it's true that the activities we suggest are firmly rooted in the notion that we acquire languages best when we are exposed and can interact with meaningful language - language we understand. But the book is also strongly rooted in the tradition of skill theory, which claims that we can can better at things by having them explained then practising them repeatedly in an engaging manner. Micro-skills, we argue, can be practised and automatised.

By the way, it's hard to write about listening without referring to general language acquisition issues, so we have made a point of explaining some key concepts such as skill theory, comprehensible input, memory, cognitive load, dual coding theory, interaction and input processing. We have also been at pains to include specific advice about preparing students for examinations and helping them develop their cognitive and metacognitive strategies to maximise their existing knowledge.

We could easily have called our book "Interactive Listening" since nearly all the tasks described involve both listening to and speaking with others, or listening plus other skills. We stress how important it is when planning to integrate the four language skills of listening, speaking, reading and writing. Our book is one you can dip into or read end to end and is aimed mainly at modern language teachers working in secondary schools, teaching pupils up to intermediate level (GCSE in England, A2/B1, using the CEFR). English language teachers (ESL) will also find lots to interest them. We hope it will become a go-to text for teachers in training.

Do go and have a look! We believe teachers and their students will derive great benefit from many of the activities we suggest. The book would make a useful addition to any personal or departmental library. Look out for the odd extract from the book to appear on this blog in coming weeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,