Skip to main content

Greta Thunberg traverse l'Atlantique en voilier


Greta Thunberg is an amazing young woman. As I post this she is in the middle of the Atlantic on a sporting yacht, on her way to a conference in New York. Here's a resource you could use next term with your GCSE groups (low intermediate). One of many new ones to be uploaded in September to frenchteacher.net. The formatting here may be awry. Copy and paste and you can easily fix it.


En août 2019 la jeune militante pour le climat Greta Thunberg a traversé l’océan Atlantique à bord d’un voilier pour aller à New York, où elle a assisté au sommet pour le climat des Nations Unies en septembre.
Greta Thunberg avait annoncé en juillet qu’elle n’irait plus à l’école pendant un an pour se concentrer sur son combat contre la crise climatique. L’adolescente de seize ans avait aussi indiqué qu’elle comptait aller au sommet de l’ONU. Mais puisqu’elle refuse de prendre l’avion, elle a dû  trouver un moyen de transport peu ou non polluant pour traverser l’océan qui sépare l’Europe du continent américain.
« Bonne nouvelle! », a-t-elle tweeté, en expliquant qu’on lui avait offert une place à bord du yacht Malizia II et prendrait la mer à la mi-août.
Le Malizia II est un yacht de course, skippé par le marin allemand Boris Herrmann et Pierre Casiraghi de Monaco. Le bateau est équipé de panneaux solaires et de turbines sous-marines assurant un voyage transatlantique zéro émission carbone.
Après être allée aux Etats-Unis, Greta Thunberg est allée aussi au Canada et au Mexique avant d’aller à la conférence annuelle sur le changement climatique organisée par l’ONU en décembre à Santiago, au Chili.
C’était son premier voyage en Amérique du Nord et du Sud depuis le lancement de son mouvement devant le parlement suédois en 2018.

A. Vocabulaire

activist - __________      to cross - _________       on board - _ ____ __
sailing boat – v______ (m)    to attend - _________ _       summit - _______ (m)
fight – c______ (m)     crisis - _____ (f)         to indicate - ________
to intend to – c______      since, because – p_____       polluting - ________
in mid August - _ __ __-_____    to skipper - ________      sailor – m______ (m)
solar panel - _______ (m) _______   underwater - ____-_______      launch – l_________ (m)

B. Vrai, faux ou pas mentionné ? Corrigez les phrases fausses.

1. Greta Thunberg est allemande.   
2. Elle milite contre la crise du climat.  
3. Elle a été accompagnée par son père.  
4. Elle a assisté a un sommet à New York.  
5. Elle ne prend jamais l’avion.    
6. Elle a voyagé à bord d’un sous-marin.
7. Elle a trouvé le voyage difficile.
8. Elle a fait le voyage en août.
9. Le bateau est très écologique.
10. Elle est allée à Paris plus tard.

C. Répondez

1. Quel âge  a Greta Thunberg?      
2. Pourquoi elle ne prend jamais l’avion ?          
3. Comment a-t-elle traversé l’Atlantique ?            
4. Elle a assisté à quoi à New York ? 
5. Décrivez le yacht.
6. Expliquez « zéro émission carbone »

D. Translate this sentence
« Après être allée aux Etats-Unis, Greta Thunberg est allée aussi au Canada. »

Now translate these sentences
1.     After going to France, she went to Spain and England. 
2.     After going out, she went to the restaurant.
3.     After arriving at school, she went to her classroom.
4.     After returning home, she went up to her room.
5.     After falling from her bike, she went to hospital.
6.     After coming to France, she went to work in Paris.
7.     After returning from school, she entered the kitchen.
8.     After leaving France, she went to live in Scotland.

E. Summarise the original text in English in about 80 words


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g