Skip to main content

Semantic versus thematic clustering of vocabulary

This is a snippet from our forthcoming book about memory. This is from a chapter about remembering vocabulary.

 

Researchers have sought more efficient ways of learning vocabulary from lists. One popular comparison has been made between semantic and thematic vocabulary clustering types. Semantic clusters provide students with groups of words that are related by their meanings. For example, parts of the body, such as eye, head, ear and mouth. The argument for semantic clusters is appealing. Firstly, the similarity between the words should ease the learning task and secondly, the student should become aware of slight distinctions between the related words. In addition, most of us have been used to learning and teaching words in this way.

Nation (2001) argues that:

1.      - It requires less effort to learn words in a set.

2.      - It is easier to retrieve related words from memory.

3.      - It helps learners see how knowledge can be organised.

4.      - It reflects the way such information is stored in the brain (so-called semantic fields).

5.   - It makes the meaning of words clearer by helping students to see how they relate to and may be differentiated from other words in the set.

But the downside of teaching words in this way is that words of similar meaning may cause interference effects in memory. The closer two words are in meaning or association (including synonyms and antonyms), the greater the risk of interference and forgetting.

On the other hand, thematic clusters refer to the arrangement of a group of words that belong to a specific knowledge schema. The advantage is thought to be that memory is activated more powerfully when words are related to lived experience or episodes (knowledge schemas). So if you teach a group of words in the context of a lived experience the words should be easier to recall later. Tinkham (1997) suggested that arranging words by general theme in this way can limit the effects of interference between similar words. An example of a thematic cluster would be sweat-shirt, changing room, tries on, wool and salesperson.

So what is the evidence? On the whole, researchers now favour thematic word sets to semantic. Some studies report that semantic grouping is actually worse than presenting lists of totally unrelated words. So if your textbook presents words as semantic clusters you should at least question the validity of this approach, which may just stem from tradition. As Dronjic (2019) points out, thematic clustering is better on the whole than semantic clustering and better also than just listing words randomly.

Does this mean you should stop playing Simon Says to teach parts of the body? Not at all. Don’t forget the importance of motivation, distinctiveness and gesture in forming memories! In any case, all researchers agree that learning from lists, although apparently efficient, is a very small part of what learning vocabulary is all about.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more