Skip to main content

Video listening and reading - film/AV director

 


Here is an example of a frenchteacher resource for A-Level which combines listening and reading. When students get captions they are likely to focus on those more than the spoken text, but the speech is heard and the visual content is interesting. You could at some stage get the students to listen without the transcript (eyes closed). This video talks to to two directors, one in film, one in the audio-visual sector. Lots of good film and TV vocabulary, Because the text is visible, I avoided gap-fill style work and went for questions in English. As always the answers are given.

Servez-vous!


Le métier de réalisateur  2m 15

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izlCIRDaYYw

Regardez, écoutez, mettez la vidéo sur pause et répondez en anglais

émission de flux – a one-off show or broadcast that viewers will watch only once

cadreur – camera person    scenario – script     éclairer – to light    gérer – to manage

 

1.    What type of programming does Gilles Marliac direct?

2.    What does Gilles compare a director to? 

3.    Who does he give instructions to? Mention THREE types of person.

4.    What do you think an auteur-réalisateur does? 

5.    What other roles does Gilles describe?

6.    What do you think the words tournage, montage and post-production are? Explain the latter. 

7.    What qualities does Mikaël say a director needs? 

8.    What Gilles go on to say about a good director? Mention THREE points.

9.    What does Mikaël say that directors need to be aware of?

10.  What does Gilles say next? 

11.  Why does Mikaël love shooting the film? 

12.  What’s the hardest thing, according to Gilles? 

13.  What does Mikaël seem to like?

14.  What does Gilles find tiring? 

15.  What does Mikaël go on to say? Explain.


 

Answers

 

1.    Magazine programmes, documentaries, entertainment.

2.    Conductor of an orchestra.

3.    Camera, sound, technical teams.

4.    He/she is a director who has a say in the script, turning a script into a realistic movie.

5.    Defines how the programme will be filmed, where cameras are placed, how it will be lit.

6.    Filming, editing, post-production (e.g. special effects).

7.    Be human, sensitive to people’s needs, “tell them their stories” (converse, listen??)

8.    A good manager. Demands a lot from the team with a smile. Great sense of visual detail.

9.    Time flies – every second counts when you are managing lots of people.

10.  You have to manage your stress.

11.  It’s when your individual idea is carried out by a team.

12.  You never know what you’ll be doing later. There’s no job security.

13.  Lack of routine/boredom.

14.  Moving on from one project to another.

15.  Everyone tells you it can’t be done, but you have to ignore them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics