Skip to main content

Exploiting Tarsia puzzles


Image: Pinterest

Tarsia puzzles come in various shapes and sizes, but the basic idea is that students have to complete the overall shape by matching items, e.g. vocabulary, translations or questions and answers. As with dominoes, one edge has to be matched with another. Tarsia puzzle can be done individually in silence or in pairs or even groups, I suppose, but I'd avoid the latter. Judging by a Google image search, they seem to be used most commonly in maths classes.

I must admit that when I first came across Tarsia puzzles I was a little sceptical, as I tend to be with other cut-out jigsaw activities. Although they are quick to make, the cutting out bit takes time, so you might want to get a helper for that. You also need a good storage system for re-use.

Clare Seccombe has examples on her Lightbulb Languages site. This year I decided to add some to the Y7 page of my own site. I do think that they are generally more suited to beginners at primary level or Y7 of secondary school, but you could design them for older users as part of a teaching sequence.

So I have built up a nice little collection on the site, using maths teacher Mr Barton's free to use tarsiamaker.co.uk. Thank you!

To help me get my head around how the puzzles might be used, and the give some ideas to teachers out there, I put together a separate sheet, which I am copying in below.

Maybe you have used or could come up with other ideas. Do leave a comment!

(Clare left a link in the comments. See http://www.ideaseducation.co.uk/resources/Tarsia-ideas.pdf.)


Exploiting Tarsia puzzles

 

Practicalities

Cutting out the shapes takes time. Some teachers do them on card, laminate them for later use. Others get someone else to cut them out, or colour-code different sets so that don’t get mixed up. Keep them in envelopes for more than one use.

 

How to use them

You could use them at various points in a teaching sequence.

Pupils have to put the shapes together correctly to form the final shape. They work a bit like dominoes therefore. Pupils could do this individually or in pairs. If they do it in pairs there is less cutting up to do!

Once the puzzles are completed, you could display the solution, then use the sentences as the basis for further activities, for example:

 

·         Choral repetition (e.g. with back-chaining, whispering).

·         Dictation.

·         Delayed dictation (say a sentence, leave several seconds, then pupils write it down).

·         Gapped dictation.

·         Delayed copying (same principle as delayed dictation).

·         Oral or written translation from memory.

·         A ‘sentence chaos’ game.

·         ‘Spot the error’ – read sentences with a deliberate error. Pupils must identify it.

·         ‘Complete my sentence’ – start a sentence which pupils must complete orally or in writing.

·         ‘Translate-transcribe’ – give a sentence in English which pupils write down in French.

·         ‘Last one to speak loses’. In pairs pupils must recall French sentences in turn. The first one who cannot recall a sentence is the loser.

·         ‘Running dictation’. Display some sentences from the puzzle around the room. In pairs, one pupil has to ‘fetch’ a sentence, return to their partner and dictate it, as the other partner writes it down.

·         ‘Mind reader’. Think of a sentence which the class must guess. You could make this a team game.


Comments

  1. I have a document with some ideas for using Tarsia here http://www.ideaseducation.co.uk/resources/Tarsia-ideas.pdf

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,