Skip to main content

Parallel reading: ocean level rise

This is an example of a parallel reading task from the Y9 (CEFR A2) page of frenchteacher.net. I like the concept of parallel reading as a way to give access to harder, often more interesting texts. The main downside is that the language is not deeply processed (since there is not much built-in recycling and intensive work involved). Another possible downside is the emphasis (in some texts) on less frequent vocabulary. This doesn't worry me much since, in French, many more technical words are cognates and often, though not high frequency, the words are important, as in the example below. 

Overall, for me, therefore, parallel texts are a useful occasional way to spice up lessons and give experience with harder texts.

The example below is on the important issue of sea level rise. Since 1901, the average level of the oceans has risen by between 15 and 25 cm. Most of this rise is, according to climate scientists, down to human-induced climate change. Feel free to copy and use. There are plenty more examples of parallel reading texts on the Y7, Y8 and Y9 pages of my site.

As well as the two texts, there are correct sentences to spot and a vocab grid to complete. This ensures that students do much more than a cursory read. You could exploit the materials further if you wanted.

Les causes de la montée du niveau de la mer

La température de la planète ne cesse d'augmenter sous l'effet de l'action de l'Homme. Les activités humaines utilisent des ressources fossiles (gaz, charbon et pétrole) qui libèrent beaucoup de gaz. Ces gaz forment une couche qui concentre la chaleur sur Terre. Ce sont les gaz à effet de serre (GES).

Au fil des années, l'effet de serre naturel s'est renforcé à cause de l'augmentation du volume de ces gaz produit par l'Homme. Donc la température atmosphérique augmente, les glaces terrestres fondent et le niveau de l'Océan s'élève. Cette montée des eaux menace directement certains territoires insulaires.

Par action de la chaleur, les glaces continentales (accumulation de neige, glaciers, calottes polaires) fondent. Ce surplus d'eau se transfert dans l'Océan, entraînant une augmentation de son niveau. Il est important ici de bien distinguer les glaces polaires situées sur les continents, de la banquise déjà présente dans l'Océan. Si la banquise fond, ce qui est déjà le cas, cela ne fera pas monter le niveau des mers: la fonte des glaçons dans un verre d'eau ne fait jamais monter le niveau de l'eau !

Il existe un autre phénomène, appelée la dilatation thermique de l'eau. En se réchauffant, l'eau se dilate, c'est-à-dire qu'elle « gonfle » et prend plus de place. Pour une même quantité d'eau, l'eau chaude occupe un volume supérieur à l'eau froide. Cette dilatation n'est pas anecdotique puisqu'elle représenterait entre 30% et 50% de la hausse globale du niveau de la mer.

Depuis 1901 le niveau de la mer a augmenté de 15-25 cm.

The causes of sea level rise

The temperature of the planet continues to increase under the effect of the action of Man. Human activities use fossil resources (gas, coal and oil) which release a lot of gas. These gases form a layer that concentrates heat on Earth. These are greenhouse gases (GHGs).

Over the years, the natural greenhouse effect has increased due to the increase in the volume of these gases produced by humans. So the atmospheric temperature increases, the terrestrial ice melts and the level of the ocean rises. This rising water level directly threatens certain island territories.

By the action of heat, continental ice (accumulation of snow, glaciers, polar ice caps) melts. This excess water is transferred to the ocean, causing an increase in its level. It is important here to clearly distinguish the polar ice located on the continents, from the pack ice already present in the ocean. If the pack ice melts, which is already the case, this will not raise the sea level: the melting of ice cubes in a glass of water never raises the water level!

There is another phenomenon, called the thermal expansion of water. As the water heats up, it expands, that is, it "swells" and takes up more space. For the same quantity of water, hot water occupies a greater volume than cold water. This dilation is not anecdotal since it would represent between 30% and 50% of the global rise in sea level.

Since 1901 sea levels have risen between 15 and 25 cm.

Cochez les phrases correctes seulement

1.         La température de la Terre augmente.

2.         Les activités humaines ne contribuent pas.

3.         Les ressources fossiles produisent des GES.

4.         Les glaces terrestres fondent.

5.         La montée des eaux ne présente pas de danger.

6.         Certaines îles sont déjà menacées.

7.         L’eau fondue de la terre passe dans les océans.

8.         Il faut distinguer entre les glaces sur terre et dans la mer.

9.         La fonte de la banquise dans l’océan fait monter le niveau de la mer.

10.       La fonte de la glace continentale augmente le niveau de la mer.

11.       La dilatation de l’eau joue un rôle important.

12.       Quand la température de l’eau augmente, cette eau prend plus de place.

13.       L’eau froide occupe plus de place que l’eau chaude.

14.       La dilation est responsable de la majorité de la hausse du niveau des océans.

15.       Depuis 1901 le niveau de la mer n’a pas augmenté.

 

Complétez la liste de vocabulaire

 

Français

Anglais

augmenter

 

niveau

 

 

threatened

 

ice

banquise

 

 

rise

dilatation

 

 

due to

 

ice cube

chaleur

 

 

glass

augmentation

 

 

excess

couche

 

distinguer

 

 

to melt

 

Answers

The correct sentences are: 1,3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g