Skip to main content

Book review: The Art and Science of Language Teaching

I’ve just finished reading this excellent book by Dr Lara Bryfonski and Professor Alison Mackey, both highly esteemed researchers and teachers at Georgetown University. As the title of the book might suggest, this is a ‘research to practice’ type of book aimed at language teachers. To cut to the chase, I can strongly recommend it as a text for trainee teachers and those with some experience.

The book consists of 21 chapters, each with the same very clear structure. The starting point of each chapter is the lived dilemmas of practising teachers (‘voices from the classroom’). The writers then examine what research suggests about how to respond to these teachers’ issues, provides practical classroom guidance and points out what is missing from the research (the ‘science’). Questions to consider are also included.

References to research are very light-touch in the main body of the text, with specific references and descriptions of studies and books at the end of each chapter. Sentences often begin with ‘Research suggests… ‘without giving precise references. This approach makes the text very readable for teachers who probably don't read research papers and books a great deal. The ideas and guidance are explained very clearly as a result.

Here is how an example chapter, the one on teaching pronunciation, is structured:


Other topics  covered include strategies, interaction, maximising input, grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, technology, assessment, professional development, lesson and unit planning, classroom content and activities, authentic and literacy skills.

Underpinning the whole book are the authors’ main four principles behind successful language learning. These are: input, production, negotiation of meaning (interaction) and corrective feedback. Throughout the text we are referred back to these principles when asked to think about what might work best in classrooms.

Overall, the book adopts, like others, a ‘no best method’ view of the field, though it becomes increasingly clear as you work through the text, that the authors’ view is that Task-Based Language Teaching is a ‘best bet’ approach for many contexts. This is partly a reflection of the authors’ own research interests.

At various points, the writers remind us that much research in second language acquisition is carried out with university students and may not be easily applicable to younger learners, including those in primary and secondary schools (high schools). Although Bryfonski and Mackey work in higher education, they really do try hard to make their guidance as applicable as possible to the experience of everyday teachers. They largely succeed in doing so. Just occasionally I thought ‘not so sure about that’, for example when it is suggested that teachers make a note after every lesson about what went well and what went not so well. If only there were time! More significantly, some of Task-Based lessons and assessment techniques looked unworkable in many high school classrooms.

Many of the teaching ideas may seem mainstream to experienced practitioners, but will be new to novice teachers, for example information gap tasks, games like Battleships and running dictation.

As far as the research is concerned, readers are introduced to various hypotheses and principles, such as comprehensible input, interaction, spaced repetition, working memory, output, developmental orders, and principles of formative and summative assessment.

Anything missing in the book? Because of its bias towards Communicative and Task-Based Language Teaching, there is nothing much about other more or less widely used approaches such as EPI (lexicogrammar), TPRS, AIM, Knowledge Organisers and even classic Oral-Situational. Drills are treated fairly dismissively, whereas it would have been possible to describe some widely used drills. Further, novice teachers may have welcomed more on the detail of designing lessons. The text doesn’t really go into the fine grain of that area. More about skill acquisition theory would have been useful.

Overall, then, an excellent, welcome book, which should be on every language teacher’s shortlist and which complements another enjoyable book with a communicative leaning, which I reviewed a while ago, Common Ground by Dr Florencia Henshaw and Maris Hawkins.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,