Skip to main content

Likely or unlikely?

Here is a simple activity to get students to read, interpret meaning, read aloud and produce language. I call the activity 'Likely or unlikely' and it works as follows.

Display some sentences on the board, like the ones in French below. Some of the sentences make sense, some don't because they are not plausible.

All the sentences given further down include various first person uses of the present tense with some repetition of common verbs. Try the following sequence:

  1. Students read individually and note whether they think each statement is plausible or not. In pairs, students can compare their answers.
  2. The teacher reads aloud each sentence and has the class repeat chorally and individually ('cold-called'). Any unknown words can be quickly translated.
  3. The teacher elicits the answer (likely or unlikely) from the class with hands up.
  4. Where it is agreed an answer is unlikely, the class is asked to write a plausible alternative on a mini-whiteboard or on paper. Individual students suggest some of these alternatives and the rest of the class can judge with hands up if they are indeed plausible.
  5. (Alternative - maybe better - students can be asked to suggest an alternative which may be plausible or implausible, then the class adjudicates.)
  6. Individuals write down plausible or implausible statements. (Many will choose implausible ones as they are more fun.)
  7. In pairs, each partner listens to their partner's suggestions and decides if they are plausible or not.

The activity has a number of advantages going for it:

  • Students get to read and hear a lot of comprehensible language (provided the examples chosen are within their range - only the teacher will know this.) Virtually the whole task is in the target language.
  • Students get to read aloud from the board, reinforcing their phonics skills.
  • Students get to make decisions based on comprehension and plausibility.
  • Students produce their own statements orally and on paper. This will need retrieval of language from memory or recycling of material on the board.
  • Many classes will have fun coming up with their own silly examples; some creativity is needed.

 Here are the French examples at Level A1 (let's say about two years of learning).

1.    J’achète du pain à la boulangerie.
2.    Je joue au football à la piscine.
3.    Je regarde un film dans les toilettes.
4.    J’achète une baguette à la boucherie.
5.    Je joue au cricket en France.
6.    Je vais à la piscine pour jouer au tennis.
7.    Je vais au parc pour jouer au football avec mes amis.
8.    Je parle français en Belgique.
9.    Je mange des céréales au petit déjeuner.
10   J’achète une glace au chocolat à la pharmacie.
11   Je vais en Australie en voiture.
12   Je regarde la télé dans la salle de bains.
13   Je mange un dinosaure au restaurant.
14   Je parle anglais à la maison.
15  Je fais mes devoirs dans la chambre.
16  J’achète un gâteau à la pâtisserie.
17  Je joue de la guitare au cinéma.
18  Je mange du coca cola.
19  Je suis végétarien. Je mange du poulet.
20  Je vais au cinéma pour acheter un livre.
21  Je regarde une série sur Netflix.
22 Je parle français au Canada.
23 Je mange des insectes à la cantine.
24 Je déteste le chocolat.
25 En général je parle français avec mes parents.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a langua...

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans, ...

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue ...