Skip to main content

Classrooms or learning spaces?

Chris Harte has posted some pictures of the classrooms in his department. Very interesting, though I have to say that it is not a pattern I would opt for with our particular pupils. Over the years, like many other teachers, I have experimented with different table and chair arrangements: group tables, horse shoes, traditional rows or even a combination of rows and a central horsehoe. We now use traditional rows and create a horseshoe for smaller groups, usually A-level.

Have a look at Chris's pictures and commentary:

I like the presence of the computers, though in this case pupils have to share, so, although collaboration is encouraged (can be good), less work may get done (bad). The obvious problem with group tables is the one of sight lines to the teacher and the board. If you believe that a good deal of teaching should be teacher-led, then rows may make better sense. In any case, pupils can quickly turn sideways or around to create pairs and groups.

The question of seating arrangements is a fundamental one, of course, since it is associated with methodology. If you believe that progress is best achieved with teacher instruction, whole class response, pair and individual work, then rows or similar (e.g. horseshoes) may still make sense. If you believe that there are broader educational issues to do with collaboration, teacher as facilitator, problem solving etc, then a group table arrangement may suit. If your classes respond better to group working than teacher-led approaches, then group tables may make sense. I guess you have to lay out a room in a way that suits your teaching style and the pupils' learning style.

My own experience with above average aptitude secondary children leads me to conclude that traditional rows make sense. If I had room for concentric horseshoes, then that also works well and allows pupils to be better seen and heard by their peers. Kids being kids, if they are sitting in a group facing away from the teacher, they are more likely to waste time, aren't they?

As for the computers, well, one per table in every room would be ideal, but failing that, a 30 station separate room, easy to book, works fine.

I'd be interested to hear any thoughts on this.

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:

Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

GCSE and IGCSE revision links 2018

It's coming up to that time of year again. In England and Wales. Here is a handy list of some good interactive revision links for this level. These links are also good for intermediate exams in Scotland, Ireland and other English-speaking countries. You could copy and paste this to print off for students.

Don't forget the GCSE revision material on of course! How could you?

As far as apps for students are concerned, I would suggest the Cramit one, Memrise and Learn French which is pretty good for vocabulary. For Android devices try the Learn French Vocabulary Free. For listening, you could suggest Coffee Break French from Radio Lingua Network (iTunes podcasts).

Listening (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher)

How useful is learning verb conjugations?

I guess most of you out there have at some point got your students to study verb tables, chant or sing verb paradigms, or played games to practise endings - Battleships and the interactive site Conjugemos spring to mind. Many of us have also found ourselves at some point bemoaning students' lack of skill with verb inflections and wondered what we can do improve the situation.

Most of you probably assume that memorising verb tables will lead to improvements in spoken and written accuracy and fluency. Is this actually the case?

The case for 

Common sense might suggest that if you practise the small bits of a second language you should be able to build them up like lego into larger bits. By practising the micro skills, the component parts, you become better at the main game - think of the musician practising scales or the footballer doing shooting practice. These activities lead to improved performance. This is the basis of skill acquisition theory and it has its proponents in academi…