http://www.multilingualliving.com/2011/05/04/learn-languages-make-bilingual-kids-multilingual-kids-smarter-bialystok-petitto/
If you have 28 minutes to spare, have a look at this interesting discussion featuring the eminent Canadian researchers Ellen Bialystok, whose speciality is bilingualism and intelligence, and Laura-Ann Petitto, a neuroscientist. The discussion is pitched at the intelligent layman, but is certainly of interest to foreign language teachers.
The title of this post is simplistic, of course, though Bialystok does state that any stimulating mental activity is good for front brain development, so bilingualism is certainly good for you. She points out that twenty tears ago we would not have been asking if it was good for you, but rather is it bad for you. Times have changed.
Another useful point made by Petitto is that very young learners are better at picking up syntax and phonological patterns, but that vocabulary is equally well acquired by humans of all ages. Does this suggest that we should be focusing more on vocabulary with adolescent learners? She also explains that we should not automatically assume that adults are inferior language learners. If we had five years of solid input at the right level (which is what babies and toddlers get), we would be just as fluent. She also states that sheer quantity of input is not the key. Quality is more important - perhaps an argument against the "natural" or "direct" method and a case for structured input. This corresponds with the common sense exercised by teachers.
Does bilingualism make kids smarter? Depends what you mean by smart, but Petitto does quote evidence that youngsters from lower socio-economic groups, when exposed to bilingual education, improve their abilities in a range of processing tasks. Otherwise, the evidence is not clear, perhaps because we do not have a clear definition of intelligence.
If you have 28 minutes to spare, have a look at this interesting discussion featuring the eminent Canadian researchers Ellen Bialystok, whose speciality is bilingualism and intelligence, and Laura-Ann Petitto, a neuroscientist. The discussion is pitched at the intelligent layman, but is certainly of interest to foreign language teachers.
The title of this post is simplistic, of course, though Bialystok does state that any stimulating mental activity is good for front brain development, so bilingualism is certainly good for you. She points out that twenty tears ago we would not have been asking if it was good for you, but rather is it bad for you. Times have changed.
Another useful point made by Petitto is that very young learners are better at picking up syntax and phonological patterns, but that vocabulary is equally well acquired by humans of all ages. Does this suggest that we should be focusing more on vocabulary with adolescent learners? She also explains that we should not automatically assume that adults are inferior language learners. If we had five years of solid input at the right level (which is what babies and toddlers get), we would be just as fluent. She also states that sheer quantity of input is not the key. Quality is more important - perhaps an argument against the "natural" or "direct" method and a case for structured input. This corresponds with the common sense exercised by teachers.
Does bilingualism make kids smarter? Depends what you mean by smart, but Petitto does quote evidence that youngsters from lower socio-economic groups, when exposed to bilingual education, improve their abilities in a range of processing tasks. Otherwise, the evidence is not clear, perhaps because we do not have a clear definition of intelligence.
Comments
Post a Comment