Skip to main content

So predictable!

The French presidential election is taking a predictable course. In a recent Harris poll Sarkozy was sitting on 24% with Marine Le Pen (Front National) not far behind on 20% for the first round. Needless to say, Sarko's first priority is to not do a Jospin and get beaten in the first round, so he is cosying up to right-wing voters by, for example, coming out (if I can say that) against gay marriage, gay adoption and votes for foreigners in local elections. If he makes it to round 2, his language may soften a bit and in any case we are bound to see him play the experience card. He has been a man for a crisis, serious, out there with Merkel on the European stage, protecting France's long term interests.

Photo by Robin King from
Meanwhile, François Hollande (on 28% in that Harris poll), whilst promising the Earth to left-leaning voters, is playing the man in the street card, which he has to given that he has remarkably little experience for a presidential candidate. Will he seem presidential enough? The eminently sensible, centrist François Bayrou will no doubt get squeezed in the middle and fail to make it to the second round.

So it will come down to Sarkozy's unenviable record, the force of the "time for a change" rhetoric (le changement is already to be seen on Hollande's posters - yawn), Sarkozy's experience, Hollande's lack of it and, when it comes down to it, are the French willing to turn a blind eye to their dislike for Sarko and take a risk with the genial but untested Hollande.

The polls don't look good for Sarkozy at the moment, but these contests between left and right are historically tight.

By the way, the photo refers to Karcher because you may recall that Sarko once suggested cleaning up the racaille ("scum") of the suburbs with a jet washer. Not his proudest moment.

Version française

 L'élection présidentielle française suit son cours prévisible. Dans un récent sondage Harris, Sarkozy était à 24%, Marine Le Pen (Front national) pas très loin derrière à 20% pour le premier tour. Il va sans dire que la première priorité de Sarko c'est de ne pas "faire un Jospin" en étant battu au premier tour, alors il fait de son mieux pour plaire aux électeurs de droite, par exemple, en se prononçant contre le mariage gay, l'adoption homosexuelle et le vote des étrangers aux élections locales. S'il arrive sain et sauf au deuxième tour, son langage pourait s'adoucir un peu et en tout cas nous le verrons jouer la carte de l'expérience. Il sera l'homme à la hauteur de la crise, sérieux, bien visible côte à côte avec Merkel sur la scène européenne, prêt à défendre la France contre le tourbillon économique.
Pendant ce temps, François Hollande (le 28% dans ce sondage Harris), promettant la lune aux électeurs de gauche, joue la carte de l'homme ordinaire. Il le faut bien  étant donné qu'il possède remarquablement peu d'expérience pour un candidat à la présidentielle. Semble-t-il assez présidentiel? Le très raisonnable centriste François Bayrou sera sans aucun doute coincé dans le milieu et ne passera pas au deuxième tour.

Alors ce sera le bilan peu enviable de Sarkozy, la force du langage du changement" (Le Changement se lit déjà sur les affiches Hollande - quelle barbe!), l'expérience de Sarkozy, l'inexpérience de Hollande et, bref, la volonté des Français de s'aveugler de leur aversion pour Sarko et prendre un risque avec un Hollande génial, mais non-testé.

Les sondages ne sont pas actuellement favorables pour Sarkozy, mais ces concours entre gauche et droite sont historiquement serrés.

En passant, la photo se réfère à Kärcher parce que vous vous rappellerez peut-être que Sarko avait déjà proposé le lavage au Karcher de la racaille de la banlieue. Ce n'était pas son plus beau moment.

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:

Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

GCSE and IGCSE revision links 2018

It's coming up to that time of year again. In England and Wales. Here is a handy list of some good interactive revision links for this level. These links are also good for intermediate exams in Scotland, Ireland and other English-speaking countries. You could copy and paste this to print off for students.

Don't forget the GCSE revision material on of course! How could you?

As far as apps for students are concerned, I would suggest the Cramit one, Memrise and Learn French which is pretty good for vocabulary. For Android devices try the Learn French Vocabulary Free. For listening, you could suggest Coffee Break French from Radio Lingua Network (iTunes podcasts).

Listening (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher)

How useful is learning verb conjugations?

I guess most of you out there have at some point got your students to study verb tables, chant or sing verb paradigms, or played games to practise endings - Battleships and the interactive site Conjugemos spring to mind. Many of us have also found ourselves at some point bemoaning students' lack of skill with verb inflections and wondered what we can do improve the situation.

Most of you probably assume that memorising verb tables will lead to improvements in spoken and written accuracy and fluency. Is this actually the case?

The case for 

Common sense might suggest that if you practise the small bits of a second language you should be able to build them up like lego into larger bits. By practising the micro skills, the component parts, you become better at the main game - think of the musician practising scales or the footballer doing shooting practice. These activities lead to improved performance. This is the basis of skill acquisition theory and it has its proponents in academi…