Skip to main content

AIM Language Learning

http://www.aimlanguagelearning.com/

I've been having a look at the AIM (Accelerative Integrated Methodology) website to find out a bit more about this approach which has become widely used in Canada and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere. Although AIM has been around a few years, I confess I had only heard of it briefly via Twitter colleagues from Canada and it has not made a great mark in Britain.

The best way to learn more about it in detail would be to watch the introductory videos in which the method is explained and seen in use by enthusiastic teachers and pupils.

What struck me was that, if you get beyond the faintly hokey appeals to research, there is much that is familiar if you are a teacher who enjoys games, song, mime, drama, group and pair work. This is a set of resources and a methodology which gets youngsters very actively engaged in listening to and using the foreign language in all kinds of fun ways. There is a strong emphasis on the use of mime and gesture, considerable use of music and acting out, all underpinned by what is claimed to be an inductive approach to grammar. There is, as with many methods, an emphasis on high frequency words.  It is good to see that stories are used rather than traditional topics; stories fire the imagination and can lead to more creative language use. The teachers we hear from in the videos are are clearly huge enthusiasts and the snippets of classrooms we see reveal high quality language produced by smiling children.

The videos feature, largely, younger learners, who respond best to this kind of approach and I would imagine that teachers employing the method would temper it for older learners, appealing to more analytical skills. I can imagine that primary French teachers and children would respond very well to the resources, although I can also see its appeal for younger secondary students. It is possible to become an AIMS Foundation certificated teacher and there is an online training programme also available.

Teachers are always on the look out for panacea methods, and whilst this might not quite be it - because there is no such thing - there is undoubtedly lots to admire.

It is all created by Wendy Maxwell who has won awards for her tremendous work. Here are some sample materials.

I would have thought that AIM deserves wider recognition in the UK.

Comments

  1. Great blogpost, Steve. You've described AIM very well. You just got one thing wrong: it IS a panacea method! :) Waiting for an invite to introduce AIM to the UK!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please come Sylvia! What you do is amazing, I would love to do the training here in the UK.��

      Delete
  2. Ha ha! I'll have to take your word for that!

    ReplyDelete
  3. HI Steve. I also enjoyed your post. AIM is an amazing teaching tool. I couldn't imagine teaching French without it. I learned French as a second language in Canada and learned it via the deductive approach. That is why oral communication is my weakest area. AIM teaches learners to speak before they read and write, the same way we learn our maternal language. That is why it is such an effective approach. Come on over the pond and see it in action!
    Pauline

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'll get my ticket!

    I would add that speaking before reading and writing is not new. The "oral approach" (developing grammar skill via contextualised practice such as question-answer and repetition) has been doing this since the 1950's. The appeal to child-language acquisition is not new either. That's why I wrote that the principles of AIM are not unfamiliar. The extra emphasis on mime, gesture and acting does make it stand out a bit though.

    Thanks for commenting. It's great you have an approach you and the students enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is there any hope of AIM being introduced in the UK? As a French Primary teacher I can see the huge potential there. I already use lots of body language and active fun games, songs, etc.... but they do it to such an extent I find admirable. I'm ready to learn, anyone ready to teach????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In response to leromancer, I have been wondering the same thing.
      Have you had any success? I have implemented AIM in French in a primary school in Western Australia at the beginning of the year. I really love the whole thing and have found the kits/resources wonderful. If you are still interested, and would like to learn a bit more in person, I am in the UK (London if not too far) from mid December this year to mid Jan next year.

      Delete
    2. In response to leromancer, totally agree about the potential. I started teaching French using the AIM program and find it rewarding for myself and the kids. I teach in primary school in Western Australia. If you are still interested in learning a bit more I will be in London (if that's not too far for you) in a few days to visit family.

      Delete
    3. Hi Kirsten. I cannot meet you in person, but if you are in the London area you may be interested in contacting Helen Myers who works in Dorking, Surrey. You can find her on Twitter. @HelenMyers or at Ashcombe School. She is interested in all sorts of things.

      Delete
  6. It isn't well established in the UK, but isn't it putting a name on what many teachers do already? I would go to their site and have a look round for any more ideas there. There are teachers on Twitter who are keen, notably @warhelmets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @warhelmets is old! I am now @mmegalea and I can give you lots of information about AIM! yes, it does need more recognition in the UK! We are slowly getting there!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite Ć  60 ans

Suite Ć  mon post rĆ©cent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'Ć¢ge lĆ©gal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir Ć  quel Ć¢ge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'Ć¢ge rĆ©el de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prĆ©tendre qu'il y a peu de diffĆ©rence Ć  cet Ć©gard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation Ć  Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite Ć  60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six FranƧais sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui dĆ©fend la retraite Ć  60 ans (BVA) CĆ©cile QuĆ©guiner Plus de la moitiĆ© des FranƧais jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la rĆ©forme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de dĆ©fendre l’Ć¢ge lĆ©gal de dĆ©part en retraite Ć  60 ans ". RĆ©sultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Ɖchos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majoritĆ© de FranƧais (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui dĆ©fend le maintien de l’Ć¢ge lĆ©gal de dĆ©part Ć  la retraite Ć  60 ans,