Skip to main content

A-level French results 1993-2014

Here are grades and entry numbers for A-level French from 1993 to 2014.

Source: http://www.bstubbs.co.uk/a-lev.htm and JCQ figures for 2014.



French entries
                 A*    A    B    C    D    E    N    U   A - E  Entries 
       2014      6.6 31.0                                       10433                                     
       2013      6.5 32.0 30.3 17.9  9.1  3.4       0.8  99.2   11272
       2012      6.8 32.6 29.4 18.5  8.8  3.1       0.8  99.2   12511   
       2011      7.7 32.4 29.3 18.0  8.7  3.0       0.9  99.1   13196
       2010      7.7 31.4 28.5 18.2  9.6  3.7       0.9  99.1   13850
       2009          38.6 27.6 18.3 10.5  4.1       0.9  99.1   14333
       2008          37.3 27.7 18.9 10.6  4.3       1.2  98.8   14885
       2007          36.3 28.0 18.2 11.6  4.6       1.3  98.7   14477
       2006          34.7 27.4 19.5 11.8  5.3       1.3  98.7   14650
       2005          32.9 27.5 20.0 12.4  5.6       1.6  98.4   14484
       2004          33.4 26.8 19.8 12.6  5.8       1.6  98.4   15149
       2003          31.4 26.4 20.0 13.3  6.6       2.3  97.7   15531
       2002          29.3 25.2 20.9 13.8  7.7       3.1  96.9   15614
       2001          24.7 20.5 19.4 16.0 11.2  5.5  2.7  91.8   17939
       2000          23.5 21.5 20.1 16.3 10.5  5.6  2.5  91.9   18221
       1999          23.2 20.4 20.1 16.4 11.3  5.7  2.9  91.4   21072
       1998          21.6 20.7 19.6 17.3 11.6  6.2  3.0  90.8   23633
       1997          20.2 19.9 19.6 16.7 12.1  6.9  4.6  88.5   25916
       1996          20.9 18.0 20.3 17.3 12.5  6.9  4.1  89.0   27490
       1995          20.1 18.3 19.3 17.7 13.4  7.1  4.1  88.8   27563
       1994          19.9 17.7 19.0 17.4 13.4  7.8  4.7  87.5   28942
       1993          18.6 17.3 19.5 18.5 13.6  7.6  4.9  87.5   29886
A* grades remain relatively thin on the ground when compared with other subjects. The recent JCQ report on the A* issue explains that variations in writing performance and the way that grades are calculated from raw scores means that A* grades are bound to be lower in MFL. The headline figure of 6.6% for 2014 is only a couple of points short of, say, chemistry, but it is a much smaller proportion when you look at the comparison of A* and A grades. I would not be alarmed by the apparent grade inflation since 1993. Remember that in those days the average ability of A-level linguists was lower - just look at the entry numbers. There has been some inflation, but it has been greater in other subjects, so MFL still suffers from severe grading, but most noticeably at the A* point.

Incidentally, bearing in mind current worries about falling entries for French and German, there is no very strong correlation between the decision to make MFL optional at KL4 (a decision taken around 2004). That decision may have had some effect, but the serious decline was earlier. The JCQ report published in July, about which I recently blogged, looks into the reasons why students are rejecting languages at A-level. These reasons include a poor experience of GCSE, fear of getting a lower grade than for other subjects and the current popularity of STEM subjects.

Comments

  1. I think there is a perception that it's too hard to get a top grade so it's a risk. My niece has just narrowly failed to get into Oxford because her MFL grade let her down.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did she need an A*? Oxbridge are aware that A*s are harder to get than in other subjects so may not demand one for MFL. An A in MFL is much more achievable - statistically about as hard as sciences. Sorry she did not get her place.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tell stories

Introduction

How can we make listening more enjoyable and effective for pupils? How can we turn it from a potential chore to something more memorable (and therefore more likely to stick in their long term memories)? I am of the opinion that since humans are "wired" to engage in personal listening and speaking (the expression "social brain" has been used in this context), they may be more interested and attentive when the message comes from a real person rather than a disembodied audio source. (This may or may not be relevant, but research has been carried out which demonstrates that babies pick up phonological patterns better when they listen to a caregiver rather than listen to a tape or watch a video - see here for summaries of research into this area by Patricia Kuhl.)

One easy way to make listening stimulating for pupils is to tell them easy stories in the target language. I was reminded of this while reading Penny Ur's book 100 Teaching Tips (reviewed here

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…