Skip to main content

Retirement four years on

Four years have slipped quickly by since I gave up my job at Ripon Grammar School. I only rarely dream of teaching classes now, stress levels are down, but I soon discovered that I couldn't stop thinking about resources, methodology and sharing ideas. "Semi-retired" describes my situation well.

You see, when I began teaching in 1980 I had two possible ambitions: one was to be a Head of Department and the other, more uncertain, was to get into training teachers. I achieved the first ambition by the age of 32 and enjoyed 24 years leading some great teachers at Ripon. The second route really became unrealistic as teacher training moved gradually out of university education departments and into schools. It's also true that I would have missed teaching if I had gone into teacher education.

Since July 2012 I have kept my hand in by writing lots of resources for frenchteacher.net, which, with over 1400 schools/teachers subscribing, has become more successful than I had envisaged, blogging copiously, writing a book, doing some work for AQA leading meetings and writing training resources, and doing the occasional training sessions with teachers, for example for the York PGCE course. I get great satisfaction from working with trainees who seem so enthusiastic, agreeable and keen to learn.

So my ambition of sharing my own enthusiasm and training other teachers has, ultimately, when I think about it, been achieved thanks to the internet and social media. I can connect with far more people this way than by working face-to-face with teachers. The "online space" also means I can pick up loads of new ideas, which has given added impetus to my interest in theory and methodology. I can partly thank my friend Gianfranco Conti for this; his blogs got me thinking in different ways about language learning and questioning some of my beliefs. Other online influences have come from over the Atlantic, where teacher-trainer-bloggers like Sara-Elizabeth Cottrell share their own experience.

As time goes by I have become more pragmatic about "what works", and see a valuable role for both ends of the classic learning-acquisition spectrum. Comprehensible input is great, but you also need to build skills - the two are not mutually exclusive, as I see it. I remain sceptical about "panacea methods" but don't accept that anything goes. I like some uses of new technology, but am suspicious of tasks which take a lot of time for little return. I wish teachers were better informed about theory and research (I was always keener on this than my colleagues!), but recognise that it only provides partial answers.

One aspect of these last four years has been adjusting to the role of minor entrepreneur, rather than teacher. Frenchteacher.net was originally, from 2002 to 2012, a free site which I used to store and share worksheets. When I retired I wanted to carry on writing resources, but there was little point in doing it for nothing since I was no longer teaching. When Gianfranco and I produced our book, this reinforced the need to market resources, so I use Twitter and, to a lesser degree, Facebook to do this. Sharing resources for nothing is great, but there's nothing wrong with teachers being rewarded for their work. Sites like TES and Teachers Pay Teachers make this easy. I still share a good number of freebies, partly to encourage teachers to subscribe to others.

So four years on I am very involved in the language teaching community and hope to be so for a good few years to come.

Comments

  1. Keep up the excellent work Steve. I love the resources and the tweets. Jon Meier

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Jon. I used to use your grammar pages in class for display. Good luck with your latrst resources.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And all of us across the pond are better for your voice staying in the conversation. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. And how lucky we are that you are 'semi-retired'!. Thank you, Steve, as ever, for all your resources (I don't feel that I could teach A-Level successfully without my subscription) and for your continued dedication to help teachers in preparation for upcoming changes. This past month a new colleague and I have both bonded over our love of your website, and even more surprisingly, I made the link that a housemate in my house share near Birmingham is an ex-pupil of Ripon Grammar School who even studied French there(!) Such a small world! Thank you again for all your advice, wisdom and resources.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks. I'd be curious to know who the flatmate was.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Responsive teaching

Dylan Wiliam, the academic most associated with Assessment for Learning (AfL), aka formative assessment, has stated that these labels have not been the most helpful to teachers. He believes that they have been partly responsible for poor implementation of AfL and the fact that AfL has not led to the improved outcomes originally intended.

Wiliam wrote on Twitter in 2013:

“Example of really big mistake: calling formative assessment formative assessment rather than something like "responsive teaching".”

For the record he subsequently added:

“The point I was making—years ago now—is that it would have been much easier if we had called formative assessment "responsive teaching". However, I now realize that this wouldn't have helped since it would have given many people the idea that it was all about the teacher's role.”

I suspect he’s right about the appellation and its consequences. As a teacher I found it hard to get my head around the terms AfL and formative assess…

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…

The age factor in language learning

This post draws on a section from Chapter 5 of Jack C. Richards' splendid handbook Key Issues in Language Teaching (2015). I'm going to summarise what Richards writes about how age factors affect language learning, then add my own comments about how this might influence classroom teaching.

It's often said that children seem to learn languages so much more quickly and effectively than adults. Yet adults do have some advantages of their own, as we'll see.

In the 1970s it was theorised that children's success was down to the notion that there is a critical period for language learning (pre-puberty). Once learners pass this period changes in the brain make it harder to learn new languages. Many took this critical period hypothesis to mean that we should get children to start learning other languages at an earlier stage. (The claim is still picked up today by decision-makers arguing for the teaching of languages in primary schools.)

Unfortunately, large amounts of rese…

Dissecting a lesson: teaching an intermediate written text

This post is a beginner’s guide about how you might go about working with a written text with low-intermediate or intermediate students (Y10-11 in England). I must emphasise that this is not what you SHOULD do, just one approach based on my own experience and keeping in mind what we know about learning and language learning in particular. Experienced teachers may find it interesting to compare this sequence with what you do yourself.

You can adapt the sequence below to the class, context and your own preferred style. I’m going to assume that the text is chosen for relevance, interest and comprehensibility. The research suggests that the best texts are at the very least 90% understandable, i.e. you would need to gloss no more than 10% of the words or phrases. The text could be authentic, or more likely adapted authentic from a text book, or teacher written. It would likely be fairly short so you have time to exploit it intensively, recycling as much useful language as possible.

So here w…