Skip to main content

The Michaela method

In March 2017 I had the pleasure of visiting the school, observing two French lessons and chatting with the French staff. I am grateful to them and to the school for welcoming me. It was an interesting visit for a number of reasons, but the focus here is on the French teaching methodology.

The points I originally listed below in my original October 2016 blog remain valid. Seeing classes in action was illuminating. Pupils were very attentive, joined in extremely well and showed quick reactions, very good pronunciation and a good memory for the language they had learned. Both the Y7 class and lower set Y9 had very good spoken and writing skills and manipulated complex language, almost always prompted by English cues. The focus on reading aloud and call-response translation into French was very strong. English was liberally sprinkled throughout the lessons, but the amount of built-in repetition of French was impressive. Not a moment was wasted and pupils maintained high levels of concentration for the full hour. Both lessons were entirely teacher-led with lots of hands up. There was almost no French-French question-answer except in relation to descriptions of grammar and spelling.

It really is fascinating to observe this thorough, bilingual, translation-based, brick-building approach - Barry Smith (no longer at the school) refers to it as lego. I'm sure the pupils will go on to do well at GCSE and beyond since the classroom work ethic is excellent. The rest of this post is what I originally wrote some months ago.

Michaela Community School is a ‘Free School’ set up in 2013 and which has gained some notoriety, partly owing to a news story which made the national press and partly because it is evangelical about its ethos, spreading the word via blogs, conferences and a book which is about to be published. 

It’s an all-ability school in an inner-city area of north-west London. Its motto is ‘Knowledge is Power’, the curriculum and leadership being highly influenced by the ideas of E.D. Hirsch Jr of "cultural literacy" fame. It has an above-average percentage of students on free school meals, an indication of its social context.  A significant number of students arrive at the school with literacy problems. Students are grouped by general ability at an early stage. Michaela has become best known for its ‘no excuses’ discipline policy, and the high achievement and immaculate behaviour of its students. Anyone who visits the school notes how happy and polite the students are and how well-ordered and aspirational the environment is. I suggest you look at the video in my previous blog to get a flavour.

Its team of language teachers, Jess, Barry and Fadila adopt a rather individual way of teaching French. They might sum it up as follows: “Teach like a linguist. Think for yourself, make everything totally transparent, no guesswork, focus on accuracy and ignore orthodoxy.”  I've had a few jousts with Barry on Twitter and had the opportunity to talk with him on the phone about how they teach French. Below are the main features of the approach they use with near-beginner and low-intermediate students (Y7 to Y9).

  • Focus strongly on reading from the start (in line with the whole school policy).
  • Teach from the front; make little or no use of pair or group work.
  • Do lots of fast-paced choral and individual ‘call and response’ activity ( a phrase in English and getting the answer back in TL).
  • Don’t use pictures, since focusing on words improves literacy and leaves no room for doubt.
  • Use plenty of TL, but don’t be dogmatic about it. Students will often ask complex formulaic TL questions in class which they have practised repeatedly.
  • Use plenty of translation, especially from English into the TL.
  • Place a strong focus on phonics teaching, making links between sounds and spelling very explicit. They spend a lot of time working on letter combinations and how they relate to sounds: “yeux”, “deux”, “feu”; “boit”, “noir”, “oiseau”, and so on.
  • Don’t worry too much about grading the difficulty of language; expose students to complex language from the start, e.g. beginners will quickly learn examples of the subjunctive in set phrases and be urged to use them.
  • Get students to read aloud a lot; correct them very clearly.
  • Read aloud a lot to the class and be the sole source of listening input, at least in the first two years.
  • Insist on accuracy at all times.
  • Avoid text books and published materials; write amusing texts.
  • Include plenty of writing but especially later in the lesson.
  • Do no creative writing in the early stages (since students can go wrong too easily).
  • Use lots of memory tricks to help students retain language.
  • Explain French usage by giving literal translations in odd English: “I have a question important”.
  • Make very little use of technology since it’s likely to waste time and be less productive. Avoid PowerPoint.
  • Emphasise the simplicity of the language at all times; do this by giving clear rules and using English where needed; leave no room for guesswork or uncertainty.
  • Make frequent use of parallel texts so students know at every point what the TL means.
  • Do lots of ‘low-stakes’ tests, e.g. vocab recall.
  • No games; a key point for Michaela teachers is the notion of ‘return on investment’ or ‘opportunity cost’ – which activity will produce the most learning? Games are rejected as a point of principle.
  • Use a mix of hands-up and no hands-up ("cold calling").
  • Make lessons fun through the pleasure of learning together, not by doing ‘fun activities’; develop strong relationships.

I would pick out in particular the large amount of translation used in order to make everything totally meaningful along with a strong focus on accuracy. Traditional immersion-style TL use is rejected since it is deemed to be confusing and off-putting for students, encouraging guesswork which is discouraged. Similarly, there is no pair or group work since this could lead to guesswork and poor modelling from students. There is little emphasis on creative use of language; even so, a good deal of TL is used and recycled which clearly helps the students remember. Michaela does not use text books for French so all listening is sourced from the teachers. 

The decision to avoid visual aids is pretty unique and based on the assumption that pictures are confusing and showing English words aids general literacy. Reading is king!

Technology is avoided since the teachers believe it adds nothing to learning and leads to time-wasting.

The approach is strongly in the skill-building camp, but is a bit unusual in that language is not closely graded by difficulty, moving from the smallest, easiest language features to the more complex. Pupils are exposed to complex structures from the start, including the subjunctive. Observers are struck with how much students can do from the early stages and how much the pupils adore their teachers.

My impression from observing video clips and communicating with Barry and Jess is that achievement and motivation are very high. I also have the feeling that the approach depends on having powerful, charismatic teachers with excellent language skills. Some teachers just could not work in that way. The method also works because the whole school ethos is absolutely consistent, so pupils come along to lessons with the expectation of reading a lot, being taught from the front and being academically stretched. 

This is one reason, in fact, why it's hard to judge the methodology in isolation. While I might criticise the overly analytical approach with its constant comparison with English, the focus on accuracy over fluency (Barry argues that the former leads to the latter), the lack of exposure to other models of French, the ideological objection to pictures and lack of opportunities for pupil-pupil interaction and compositional writing, my guess is that the pupils will go on to achieve very well at GCSE. Why? Because essentially they have talented teachers who believe passionately in their approach, the pupils are working very hard and recycling a lot of language in the process.


  1. I wonder if they are planning to produce their own "French course"? I like text books, but I despair of the lack of actual "text" in UK versions. If their approach does deliver in the end, MFL teaching in the UK could be in for a shock! But a shock is needed - the so called communicative approach has had thirty years of near universal acceptance and has been found wanting. People often say this is because it isn't being done properly, but I despair when MFL teacher trainers seem to think that a child asking for a book in the target language is the best we can aspire to.

  2. Thanks for commenting. I doubt very much we shall find the best method for all pupils and all teachers. I couldn't teach the way Barry does at Michaela; it''s just not my cup of tea. There has never been a golden era of methodology. "Communicative" means different things to different people by the way, but it remains the dominant model, supported by explicit grammar teaching. I suspect a range of approaches all work more or less well depeding on the beliefs and qualities of the teacher delivering the approach. There just aren't enough brilliant teachers unfortunately.

  3. It will be most interesting when Michaela start entering pupils for exams. I get the feeling a lot of people are hoping they will fail.

  4. It would be a shame if that were the case. The staff and pupils are dedicated.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

Sentence Stealers with a twist

Sentence Stealers is a reading aloud game invented by Gianfranco Conti. I'll describe the game to you, then suggest an extension of it which goes a bit further than reading aloud. By the way, I shouldn't need to justify the usefulness of reading aloud, but just in case, we are talking here about matching sounds to spellings, practising listening, pronunciation and intonation and repeating/recycling high frequency language patterns.

This is how it works:

Display around 15 sentences on the board, preferably ones which show language patterns you have been working on recently or some time ago.Hand out four cards or slips of paper to each student.On each card students must secretly write a sentence from the displayed list.Students then circulate around the class, approaching their classmates and reading a sentence from the displayed list. If the other person has that sentence on one of their cards, they must hand over the card. The other person then does the same, choosing a sentenc…

Have a repertoire, lighten your workload (part one)

The next four blogs I'm going to post are the equivalent of one of those TV clip shows - you know, the ones where they need to fill a weekly slot by showing the best bits, or deleted scenes, from the series. But these four blogs have a theme. The clue is in the title. Like you, I worked hard when I was teaching, but I was pretty good at keeping things in proportion using a combination of economical planning, rapid marking and experience. The extra time those things created even allowed me to stay relaxed and have fun (most of the time) and to come up with the occasional innovative idea.

So, what I'm going to suggest here is that, if you have a little repertoire of go-to classroom activities, you can save yourself a lot of time and stress, and, what's more, all for the benefit of your classes. You see, I think (actually, I know) pupils like routines, but they also appreciate a bit of variety. So if you apply your repertoire of lesson/activity types sensibly you can satisfy b…

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table.

To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document.

"Ask and move" task

This is a lesson plan using an idea from our book Breaking the Sound Barrier (Conti and Smith, 2019). It's a task-based lesson adapted from an idea from Paul Nation and Jonathan Newton. It is aimed at Y10-11 pupils aiming at Higher Tier GCSE, but is easily adaptable to other levels and languages, including A-level. This has been posted as a resource on

This type of lesson plan excites me more than many, because if it runs well, you get a classroom of busy communication when you can step back, monitor and occasionally intervene as students get on with listening, speaking and writing.