Skip to main content

How do you seat your classes?

Periodically on Twitter a thread begins about seating pupils in rows or around grouped tables. Such threads often associate seating arrangements with a general view of education. In essence, rows indicate a traditionalist view (teacher as “sage on stage”) while groups reflect a progressive perspective (“guide from the side”). I wonder what seating arrangements you use and why.

I tried out various seating systems during my career: rows, horse shoes and grouped tables, occasionally a combination of central horse shoe and rows to the side and behind. For at least 10 years my tiny classroom meant rows were the only solution. For many “itinerant” teachers you have no choice - you turn up and work with whatever is already in place. By the end of my career I used forward facing rows then moved tables into a horseshoe for small groups of about 15 or fewer.

The arguments for different seating patterns have been well rehearsed: better teacher and board visibility with rows, greater encouragement of peer discussion with groups and facilitation of whole group discussion with horseshoes. Research on this area is very limited and not much help. When we wrote The Language Teacher Toolkit we came across just one study which gave an advantage to rows for individual quiet study (less opportunity for distraction).

In the end, for larger groups of around 30 pupils I was most comfortable with rows. Why? I wanted pupils to see me and the board clearly and I wanted to be able to easily scan the class, left to right, front to back. Rows helped me establish good control and relationships. I was not a frequent user of group work, but did make frequent use of pair work, particularly what Doug Lemov calls “turn and talk”, where, after modelling work from the front, pupils then practised in pairs. Rows, therefore, did not prevent me moving away from teaching from the front.

Of course seating in rows does not preclude group work or “moving around the class” activities such as surveys, running dictation or “find someone who...” tasks. My A-level groups sat in horse shoes unless the group was larger than usual. This enabled my to sit, do whole group discussion and pair work.

I don’t see a practical or pedagogical advantage to grouped seating. Pair work is more efficient than group work as there is a greater need to contribute. In groups pupils have to turn to see you when you are explaining, using visuals or leading interactions from the front. I would think inattention is more likely when using grouped tables.

Finally, I don’t accept that seating patterns need reflect your general view of education as either traditional or progressive, teacher or child-centred. You can just see this as a pragmatic issue. What helps students work most effectively?


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

A zero preparation fluency game

I am grateful to Kayleigh Meyrick, a teacher in Sheffield, for this game which she described in the Languages Today magazine (January, 2018). She called it “Swap It/Add It” and it’s dead simple! I’ve added my own little twist as well as a justification for the activity.

You could use this at almost any level, even advanced level where the language could get a good deal more sophisticated.

Put students into small groups or pairs. If in groups you can have them stand in circles to add a sense of occasion. One student utters a sentence, e.g. “J’aime jouer au foot avec mes copains parce que c’est amusant.” (You could provide the starter sentence or let groups make up their own.) The next student (or partner) has to change one element in the sentence, and so on, until you restart with a different sentence. You could give a time limit of, say, 2 minutes. The sentence could easily relate to the topic you are working on. At advanced level a suitable sentence starter might be:

“Selon un article q…

Google Translate beaters

Google Translate is a really useful tool, but some teachers say that they have stopped setting written work to be done at home because students are cheating by using it. On a number of occasions I have seen teachers asking what tasks can be set which make the use of Google Translate hard or impossible. Having given this some thought I have come up with one possible Google Translate-beating task type. It's a two way gapped translation exercise where students have to complete gaps in two parallel texts, one in French, one in English. There are no complete sentences which can be copied and pasted into Google.

This is what one looks like. Remember to hand out both texts at the same time.


English 

_____. My name is David. _ __ 15 years old and I live in Ripon, a _____ ____ in the north of _______, near York. I have two _______ and one brother. My brother __ ______ David and my _______ are called Erika and Claire. We live in a _____ house in the centre of ____. In ___ house _____ …

Worried about the new GCSEs?

Twitter and MFL Facebook groups are replete with posts expressing concerns about the new GCSEs and, in particular, the difficulty of the exam, grades and tiers. I can only comment from a distance since I am no longer in the classroom, but I have been through a number of sea changes in assessment over the years so may have something useful to say.

Firstly, as far as general difficulty of papers is concerned, I think it’s fair to say that the new assessment is harder (not necessarily in terms of grades though). This is particularly evident in the writing tasks and speaking test. Although it will still be possible to work in some memorised material in these parts of the exam, there is no doubt that weaker candidates will have more problems coping with the greater requirement for unrehearsed language. Past experience working with average to very able students tells me some, even those with reasonable attainment, will flounder on the written questions in the heat of the moment. Others will…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for frenchteacher.net three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from pixabay.com to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:





Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…