Skip to main content

The Myth of Method

This is the first of a short series of blog posts about what has been called the “post method” era of language teaching. This first post is a summary of part of Chapter 8 of B. Kumaravadivelu’s 2006 book about language learning and teaching entitled Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod (ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series).

Kumaravadivelu’s main point is that language teaching has largely moved beyond an attachment to any one method and he aims to examine what a post-method era might mean. This general point of view appeals to me as someone who is suspicious of “methods” and who believes that effective delivery of an eclectic approach probably makes sense in most contexts.

In his chapter, from Part 3 of the book, having made the distinction between “method” (“an expert’s notion derived from an understanding of the theories of language, of language learning, and of language teaching”) and “methodology” (what the teacher actually does in the classroom to maximise learning), he goes on to list nearly twenty separate methods, some of which in reality overlap, such as audiolingual, CLT, Direct Method, Oral and Situational and the Lexical Approach.

He then goes on to explode a number of myths about methods.

Myth 1. There is a best method out there waiting to be discovered.

This is doomed to failure, he writes, despite our common belief that what is new must be better than what went before. The pendulum swings, we believe we have found a better or best way only then to be disappointed. Pseudo-scientific claims are made for the latest method, but then it proves impossible to compare one method against another because there are simply too many variables at play for serious scientific analysis (including language policy, teacher beliefs, individual learner variations and needs).

He quotes the last major attempt to compare methods, the Pennsylvania Project in the 1960s (comparing audiolingual against cognitive methods) which needed in failure. As one scholar, Prabhu, put it “objective evaluation is so difficult to implement that all attempts in the past have resulted in a wider agreement about on the difficulties of doing an evaluation than on the resulting judgment on methods.”

Myth 2: Method constitutes the organising principle for language teaching.

When a new method comes along textbooks embrace it and attempt to organise teaching based on its precepts. But any method is too inadequate and limited to explain the complexity of language learning and teaching. Any one single method also ignores learner perceptions, cultural contexts, institutional constraints such as the exam system, and teacher cognition (“what teachers know, believe and think”, as Borg puts it).

Myth 3: Method has a universal and ahistorical value.

The search is always on for a method that works anywhere, but again, this ignores the realities of classrooms where there is so much unpredictability and variation. Students may be learning for different reasons and be following different paths. There is no one-size-fits-all approach that works in all times in all places.

In addition, we cannot ignore all the local knowledge picked up over the years in different countries, the cultures of which may not benefit so much from a Western research base. (Think where most second language acquisition research is done and who the dominant writers are.)

Myth 4: Theorists conceive knowledge and teachers consume knowledge.

There is a large gap between theory and practice which can be likened to that between the producer and consumer of a marketable commodity. This results in a degree of mistrust between teachers and theorists (and, as we know, most teachers rarely read research).

Teachers rarely follow a method by the book because they think experience allows them to know best. They see the limitations of any single method and adapt it, often considerably. Indeed, teachers claiming to follow different methods often do very similar things in the classroom. They often craft detailed sequences of tasks which follow no one theoretical method at all.

Myth 5: Method is neutral and has no ideological motivation.

Kumaravadivelu, here, and elsewhere in his book by the way, is at pains to note how language teaching methods can reflect ideological biases, in this case the dominance of Western thinking and, furthermore, the bias against non-native professionals as well as women (he puts forward the notion that men are seen as conceptualisers and women as practitioners). Those of you who work in the EFL field may know what an issue the native versus non-native speaker issue is - in the MFL world the perception is not the same in my experience.

One particular way ideological factors may have an effect is in the attitude to target language use. Methods which favour extensive TL use work against non-native speakers who may, nevertheless, have very good declarative knowledge of grammar as well as native (L1) language skills which can play a useful role in the classroom. This has been labelled the “monolingual tenet of L2 pedagogy.”

In addition there are commercial interests involved in employing large numbers of monolingual (usually anglophone) in EFL courses around the world. It may not be surprising, with this in mind, that modern methods favour great use of the TL and very little if any L1.

In the next post I’ll summarise and reflect on what Kumaravadivelu has to say about what he calls “the death of method.”

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad


Popular posts from this blog

The latest research on teaching vocabulary

I've been dipping into The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (2017) edited by Loewen and Sato. This blog is a succinct summary of Chapter 16 by Beatriz González-Fernández and Norbert Schmitt on the topic of teaching vocabulary. I hope you find it useful.

1.  Background

The authors begin by outlining the clear importance of vocabulary knowledge in language acquisition, stating that it's a key predictor of overall language proficiency (e.g. Alderson, 2007). Students often say that their lack of vocabulary is the main reason for their difficulty understanding and using the language (e.g. Nation, 2012). Historically vocabulary has been neglected when compared to grammar, notably in the grammar-translation and audio-lingual traditions as well as  communicative language teaching.

(My note: this is also true, to an extent, of the oral-situational approach which I was trained in where most vocabulary is learned incidentally as part of question-answer sequence…

Dissecting a lesson: using a set of PowerPoint slides

I was prompted to write this just having produced for three separate PowerPoint presentations using the same set of 20 pictures (sports). A very good way for you to save time is to reuse the same resource in a number of different ways.

I chose 20 clear, simple, clear and copyright-free images from to produce three presentations on present tense (beginners), near future (post beginner) and perfect tense (post-beginner/low intermediate). Here is one of them:

Below is how I would have taught using this presentation - it won't be everyone's cup of tea, especially of you are not big on choral repetition and PPP (Presentation-Practice-Production), but I'll justify my choice in the plan at each stage. For some readers this will be standard practice.

1. Explain in English that you are going to teach the class how to talk about and understand people talking about sport. By the end of the lesson they will be able to say and understand 20 different sport…

Designing a plan to improve listening skills

Read many books and articles about listening and you’ll see it described as the forgotten skill. It certainly seems to be the one which causes anxiety for both teachers and students. The reasons are clear: you only get a very few chances to hear the material, exercises feel like tests and listening is, well, hard. Just think of the complex processes involved: segmenting the sound stream, knowing lots of words and phrases, using grammatical knowledge to make meaning, coping with a new sound system and more. Add to this the fact that in England they have recently decided to make listening tests harder (too hard) and many teachers are wondering what else they can do to help their classes.

For students to become good listeners takes lots of time and practice, so there are no quick fixes. However, I’m going to suggest, very concisely, what principles could be the basis of an overall plan of action. These could be the basis of a useful departmental discussion or day-to-day chats about meth…

Delayed dictation

What is “delayed dictation”?

Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music.

It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too.

Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating.

In our language teaching case, though, the earworm is a word, chunk of l…

GCSE and IGCSE revision links 2018

It's coming up to that time of year again. In England and Wales. Here is a handy list of some good interactive revision links for this level. These links are also good for intermediate exams in Scotland, Ireland and other English-speaking countries. You could copy and paste this to print off for students.

Don't forget the GCSE revision material on of course! How could you?

As far as apps for students are concerned, I would suggest the Cramit one, Memrise and Learn French which is pretty good for vocabulary. For Android devices try the Learn French Vocabulary Free. For listening, you could suggest Coffee Break French from Radio Lingua Network (iTunes podcasts).

Listening (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher) (Foundation/Higher)