Skip to main content

Using pictures for listening and creative storytelling

I've blogged before about the value of a picture in generating lots of interesting language in a communicative way. In the example below a picture of a car crash can be used to create a story involving the background to the event, what happened and the people involved. Possibilities are numerous and allow students to come up with their own angles. There are no right or wrong factual answers. Different time frames can be used, including future.

My approach would be to display the picture, possibly describe it, then do a teacher-led lesson where the main goal is listening to comprehensible input, but with additional focus on speaking, reading and writing. You would ask questions, elicit answers and write them up in full or partial form on the board. In this way students get to see the language they are hearing and use it to help generate further answers. Once there is a full set of notes on the board these can then be hidden or gapped (e.g. using the "disppearing text" technique, removing more and more words or chunks until the class can more or less recount the story from memory). So this allows students to recall the story again, generating more repetitions of useful language. The story can be written up at home or in class. A really good class could use similar language to produce their own versions of the story based on the picture.

I would do this with a good GCSE (intermediate level) class or even an advanced group. So here's the example:

Image: pixabay.com

The following questions are for guidance and would be adapted to whatever the class suggests. I've included a possible role play scenario below the questions.


1.         Que voyez-vous ici?

2.         Dans quel pays sommes-nous par exemple? Comment le savez-vous ?

3.         Depuis combien de temps se trouve cette voiture ici ?

4.         C’est à quelle saison ? Comment le savez-vous ?

5.         Qu’est-ce qui s’est passé ?

6.         Qui était le conducteur du véhicule ? Décrivez-le. Il était seul ?
7.         Il y avait des passagers? Qui? Décrivez -les.

8.         Comment est-ce que l’accident s’est produit ?

9.         Que faisait le conducteur au moment de l’accident ?

10     Qui était responsable de l’accident ? Pourquoi ?

11.       Qu’est-ce que le conducteur aurait pu faire pour éviter la collision ?

12.       Où est le conducteur actuellement ? Il est en quel état ?

13.       Si d’autres véhicules sont impliqués expliquez ce qui est arrivé aux autres conducteurs et   passagers.


Imaginez que vous êtes un policier arrivé sur scène. Téléphonez à votre gendarmerie pour expliquer ce que vous avez trouvé et ce que vous avez fait.


Vocabulaire utile

le volant
steering wheel
entrer en collision
to collide
heurter/tamponner
to hit, bump into
blesser
to injure
déraper
to skid
perdre le contrôle
to lose control
les urgences
emergency services
les pompiers
fire brigade





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,