Skip to main content

The GILT Facebook group

GILT stands for Global Innovative Language Teachers. It's the Facebook professional group for language teachers around the world, although in truth it is dominated by teachers working with GCSE, IGCSE and A-level so far. Thanks largely to Gianfranco Conti it stands out from the other excellent Facebook groups such as Secondary MFL Matters and MFL Teachers' Lounge in so far as it is not just about sharing resources and finding answers to problems, but also a place to discuss theoretical and methodological matters.

Because Gianfranco set it up and is a regular contributor it has also spread the word among teachers about the lexicogrammar approach to teaching. To put it concisely and perhaps crudely, this research-informed approach is founded on the principle of chunking language within highly comprehensible texts and exercises, using, in particular, sentence builder frames and narrow reading and listening tasks. If used with skill and belief, the approach can produce lessons dominates by speaking and listening in the target language, often in pairs or small groups, and where language is always comprehensible to students. But I digress... Other approaches are available.

There are good reasons to join the group, I believe. It's a useful way to connect with teachers from different backgrounds, including TEFL. You may have your eyes opened to other techniques and approaches which you can assess critically and possibly incorporate in your own repertoire. If you are not very conversant with research issues, you'll pick up some of the major strands, such as the importance of comprehensible input, how vocabulary is best acquired, the role of listening and how to make it a more successful experience for learners, and ways to teach grammar. Links to significant research articles or  concise summaries are often posted.

In addition, teachers generously upload files to the group which can be freely shared. On occasion, teachers post resources and ask for suggestions for how they might be improved. Questions rarely go unanswered. You can also make direct contact with writers of methodological books from (mainly)  the MFL world.

The group is administered and lightly moderated by a team of teachers from various countries, including myself, so you can be assured that conversations are varied, civil and relevant. Indeed, like the other Facebook groups, the atmosphere is supportive and focused, more focused than Twitter, for example.

As an admin person, I would love to see posts from a wider range of teachers with different perspectives. I like the idea of teachers developing a less parochial perspective about the craft of language teaching. It's so easy to forget that there is a world beyond GCSE! So do come and find us on Facebook, have a lurk, share your experience, learn something new and make your own contributions!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g