Skip to main content

Video listening on frenchteacher

One of the staples of the frenchteacher site are the video listening tasks. They can be found for every level, but given how tricky it is to find level-appropriate authentic videos, most of mine are in the Y10-11 and a-level sections of the site. Below is one I uploaded fairly recently, based on an A-level topic: family life in France.

When I am selecting videos I look for: interest, relevance to the syllabus, length (short) and clarity/speed.

I'll embed the video so you can see it straight away.


Isabelle - mère célibataire  3m 06


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8whiLmbP1uk

Regardez, écoutez et répondez. Le vocabulaire dans la case vous aidera.

 

un boulot – job            une femme de ménage – cleaner   une grande surface – supermarket

le SMIG – minimum wage       à la minute pres – to the exact minute       conjoint – partner

à l’amiable – on good terms  Un HLM – council flat   allocation logement – housing benefit  

le RSA – universal credit             joindre les deux bouts – to make ends meet  

assumer – to take on, take responsibility for          le quotidien – daily life 

saisir la justice – to go to court

 

1.     Elle commence et termine sa journée de travail à quelle heure?

2.     Pourquoi est-ce qu’elle « cumule les petits boulots » au lieu de faire un emploi régulier ?

3.     Quel est son premier boulot de la journée ? Que fait-elle exactement ?

4.     Combien d’heures fait-elle ici ? Combien est-ce qu’elle gagne ?

5.     Que doit-elle faire après avoir fini son travail à la pharmacie ?

6.     Que fait-elle à 8.30 ? 

7.     Terminez la phrase : « Elle poursuit sa journée avec ………………………………….. »

8.     Quel rôle joue son ex-conjoint ?

9.     Qu’est-ce qui s’est passé il y a quatre ans ?

1    Au moment de la séparation, que pensait Isabelle ? Quelle était la réalité ?

11  Ou vivent Isabelle et les enfants ? 

1    Combien reçoit-elle comme allocation logement ? 

1    Combien est-ce qu’elle touche en salaire ? 

1    Après avoir payé toutes les charges, combien d’argent a-t-elle ? 

1    Selon Isabelle, combien gagne son ex-conjoint? 

1    Qu’est-ce qu’Isabelle ne veut plus faire ?

1    Qu’est-ce qu’elle a décidé de faire alors ?

 

 

Answers

1.         6 h du matin, 6h du soir

2.         Elle n’a ni expérience, ni diplômes.

3.         Elle travaille a la pharmacie d’un supermarché, comme femme de ménage.

4.         8 heures par semaine. 240 euros par moi.

5.         Elle doit conduire les enfants à l’école.

6.         Elle commence son deuxième boulot à la cantine d’une école.

7.         « Elle poursuit sa journée chez deux autres employeurs»

8.         Il s’occupe des enfants un weekend sur deux.

9.         Ils se sont séparés à l’amiable.

10.       Elle pensait que son ex-conjoint allait contribuer financièrement, mais il ne l’a pas fait.

11.       Dans une résidence HLM.

12.       406 euros par mois.

13.       1200 euros

14.       200 euros

15.       1200 euros

16.       Elle ne veut plus assumer toute seule les charges du quotidien.

17.       De saisir la justice (pour que son ex-compagnon contribue à l’entretien des enfants.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics