Skip to main content

An A-level discussion lesson


Do you ever feel that you would like to do a lesson totally unconnected with the syllabus? Do you like the idea of your advanced level students just communicating with each other on thought-provoking subjects? You know how language acquisition works: comprehensible input and interaction = acquisition!

Below is a set of questions/prompts which should get your quite proficient class talking. You don't have to join in, but you could be available when they get stuck for a turn of phrase or item of vocabulary. I'll give you my French prompts (from a worksheet on frenchteacher.net), then translate them in case you teach a different language.

French version

1. Si vous pouviez changer une chose dans votre vie, cela serait quoi et pourquoi ? Est-ce que votre vie serait différente aujourd’hui ?

2. Quel est votre plus grand exploit dans la vie ? Pourquoi était-ce important ?

3. Si vous aviez un superpouvoir cela serait quoi ? Vous feriez quoi avec ?

4. Si les scientifiques découvraient qu’un astéroïde allait entrer en collision avec la terre dans un mois, que feriez-vous pendant ce temps ?

5. Si vous pouviez changer ou inventer une loi, ça serait quoi ? Comment cela changerait-il le monde ?

6. Qui est la personne la plus sage que vous ayez jamais rencontrée ? Pourquoi ?

7. Si vous étiez un personnage de dessin animé, vous seriez qui ? Pourquoi ?

8. Si on pouvait lire dans les pensées des autres, est-ce que le monde serait meilleur ? Pourquoi ?

9. Si vous pouviez émigrer dans un autre pays, où iriez-vous ? Pourquoi ?

10. Si vous pouviez parler à un animal, ce serait lequel ? Qu’est-ce qu’il dirait ?

11. Décrivez la plus grande déception de votre vie.

12. Si vous pouviez voyager dans le temps, à quelle époque iriez-vous ? Pourquoi ?

13. Quelle est la chose la plus remarquable qu’un membre de votre famille a faite.

14. Imaginez que vous étiez un extra-terrestre qui arrive sur Terre. Que penseriez-vous de la planète et ses habitants ?

15. Si vous aviez le choix d’être sourd ou aveugle, quel choix feriez-vous ? Pourquoi ?


English version

1. If you could change one thing about your life, what would it be and why? Would your life be different today?

2. What is your greatest achievement in life? Why was it important?

3. If you had a superpower, what would it be? What would you do with it?

4. If scientists found out that an asteroid was going to collide with the earth in a month, what would you do during that time?

5. If you could change or invent one law, what would it be? How would that change the world?

6. Who is the wisest person you have ever met? Why ?

7. If you were a cartoon character, who would you be? Why ?

8. If you could read other people's minds, would the world be a better place? Why ?

9. If you could emigrate to another country, where would you go? Why ?

10. If you could talk to one animal, which one would it be? What would he say?

11. Describe the biggest disappointment in your life.

12. If you could time travel, what era would you go to? Why ?

13. What is the most remarkable thing that a member of your family has done.

14. Imagine you were an alien arriving on Earth. What would you think of the planet and its inhabitants?

15. If you had the choice to be deaf or blind, which choice would you make? Why ?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more