Skip to main content

My five most viewed posts this year

 As we approach the end of the calendar year, I thought I'd share the five most viewed posts I have written this year. Actually, I blog less frequently than I used to, but still managed to upload 49 posts, with this the fiftieth. 

Generally, speaking teachers click on posts which feature practical lesson ideas, more than reflections on or summaries of research. A curriculum change also gets teachers clicking and it was a post about the proposed curriculum change for GCSE which topped my chart for 2022. As it turned out, what the exam boards came up with later in the year was, predictably, more of an evolution than revolution. Yes, the oral will have reading aloud and less conversation, and the listening test includes a dictation task worth a few more marks than I would have liked. We'll see how basing listening and reading texts on a more tightly defined high-frequency vocabulary list changes things. I suspect not much, since existing texts already strongly featured high-frequency vocab anyway. And not forgetting, of course, that the needs of Ofqual require there to be a full range of grades, so plenty of students will have to get low scores. We'll also see how long the shelf life is for dictation and reading aloud.

The second most viewed post was my 10 nifty starters for language lessons. I like doing posts like this since they provide easy go-to lesson ideas which teachers may not have thought of or may just have forgotten. I always try to put the emphasis on clarity (from both the teacher's and student's perspective), ease of use and low prep. I was prompted to write that post after producing some PowerPoint-based starters for my site. I got on quite a roll with those while in our French house over the summer, when it was too hot to go out! If you have an emphasis on retrieval practice starters in your school, the starters I suggest fit the bill well.

The third most viewed post was called 10 nifty plenaries for language lessons. I shared that one just after the previous post. I think of plenaries as generally less necessary and useful than starters, but they can have a place. A plenary can also sometimes be used as a lesson filler or even a starter. But whereas a starter can be based on a previous lesson, it can also draw on material covered some time before. Starters are great for reactivating language you think students may risk forgetting, or are on the point of forgetting. To get technical, as psychologist Robert Bjork writes, you can create a bit of 'desirable difficulty' by forcing students to retrieve language items they may have to work harder to recall.

In fourth place was the post called 10 nifty standby lessons. These are those lessons you can call upon when you have been stymied by a broken photocopier or computer; or maybe when for some reason you suddenly get a lesson you haven't prepared for, for example with a cover class. An example from the post is:

My holiday in....

Tell the class what you did during a holiday in some detail. Students may take notes in the target language or in English. You then give them true/false or not mentioned statements. You will need to keep a careful mental note of what you have said. You can then get students to report back to you, or a partner, what you did. This is a good comprehensible input task. You could talk about other topics: last weekend, my pastimes, when I was young etc. Good for intermediates. They may be interested to hear what you did - you can make it all up, of course.

And finally, in fifth place....10 more nifty starters for language lessons! Yep. It seems teachers like these instant ideas to add to their toolkit.

A little weird is that, over 10 years after I returned from the classroom, I still keep thinking up ideas, or recall ones I used. Or else, I hunt down ideas online from inventive colleagues. Even weirder is that I often dream about being in the classroom, for example turning up without a lesson prepared. Not that that ever happened to me (irony klaxon). Still, at least I always had a standby lesson.

Happy Christmas to all you language teachers! Stay well and return refreshed in the new year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,