Skip to main content

Phonics bingo

The teaching of phonics (sound-spelling correspondences or SSCs), is definitely in vogue in England, not just for first language learners at primary school, but in modern language classrooms. For many years, teachers have taught the link between spelling and phonology, usually on an ad hoc basis. But since around 2016, when the TSC Review of pedagogy was published, the explicit teaching of phonics has been strongly recommended by the DfE via NCELP and, more recently, the Ofsted Research Review which itself quoted from the TSC Review (Bauckham, 2016). The NCELP resources not only embodied explicit phonics teaching, but a systematic approach to the same, i.e. planning out a sequence of when to introduce each SSC and design lessons partly based on that sequence.

The extent to which skill with phonics is acquired implicitly or through explicit teaching can be debated. Robert Woore (2022) looked at this and concluded that there is some, but not abundant, evidence that explicitly teaching sound-spelling correspondences can help students become better at spelling and pronouncing.

Whatever the evidence, the inspection body Ofsted expects to see evidence in classrooms and schemes of learning that explicit phonics teaching is going on. (The days are gone when Ofsted had no preference for teaching styles in classrooms, I think.)

My own belief is that phonics skill is primarily developed implicitly through classroom activities which involve seeing text while hearing it read aloud, reading aloud and the plethora of other classroom activities which involve listening, reading, speaking and writing. Explicit attention to the awkward areas (where the SSCs and phonology are most unlike the L1 system) can help a bit. Showing individual words with letters highlighted and choral repetition may induce boredom on its own.

In Breaking the Sound Barrier: Teaching Language Learners How to Listen (Conti and Smith, 2019) we provided many examples of activities and games which help develop phonics skill through use. One little game which builds sensitivity to sound and helps students match sounds to spelling is phonics bingo. Below is a resource I wrote for frenchteacher.ner which shows how the game may be played. The original Word doc is better formatted than below.

References

Bauckham. I. (2016). Available at: https://pure-research.york.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54043904/MFL_Pedagogy_Review_Report_TSC_PUBLISHED_VERSION_Nov_2016_1_.pdf

Woore, R. (2022). What can second language acquisition research tell us about the phonics ‘pillar’? Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045683

**************************************************************************

1.    Hand out a bingo card to each student. There are eight provided. It doesn’t matter if two or three students get the same one. The key sound/spelling correspondences are IN BOLD on each card.

2.     Instead of reading out numbers, read out sounds (phonemes). Do not read out the same one more than once. So each game only last a couple of minutes.

3.     Students can swap cards for the next game, or you can hand out more cards.

 

Below are the sounds to be spoken. They are all vowel phonemes which can be spelled in different ways in French. I have not used accurate (IPA) phonetic alphabet symbols. Remember: just utter the sound, not the word.

/u/        As in ‘une’

/ou/      As in ‘vous’

/i/         As in ‘samedi’

/e/        As in ‘été’

/e:/       As in ‘mère’

/õ/        As in ‘ballon’

/in/       As in ‘main’

/un/      As in ‘brun’

/an/      As in ‘grand’

/eu/      As in ‘bleu’

/oi/       As in ‘moi’

/o/        As in ‘gros’

/ou/      As in ‘nous’

/a/        As in ‘animal’

 

Note that there are 14 sounds, but each card only contains 12. Warn the class that they may hear a sound which is not on their card at all.

Phonics bingo cards (8 different cards) – to be cut out and distributed, one to each pupil

 

chien

 

lundi

 

 

grand

 

petit

 

été

 

mère

 

gros

 

marron

 

une

 

bleu

 

nous

 

voiture

 

 

aime

 

brun

 

bateau

 

vous

 

chat

 

papa

 

brune

 

ballon

 

matin

 

aller

 

anglais

 

petits pois

 

 

vert

 

bien

 

lundi

 

cheveux

 

brune

 

toi

 

préfère

 

français

 

avons

 

Paris

 

main

 

coucou

 

 

enfant

 

moi

 

mon

 

vin

 

préfère

 

lundi

 

animal

 

musique

 

regarder

 

route

 

blond

 

souris

 

 

fin

 

lundi

 

 

blanc

 

petit

 

éléphant

 

aime

 

gros

 

poisson

 

lune

 

bleu

 

mouton

 

moi

 

 

aime

 

brun

 

eau

 

mouton

 

voiture

 

Irlande

 

brune

 

ballon

 

matin

 

écouter

 

grande

 

moi

 

 

frère

 

bien

 

lundi

 

sœur

 

brune

 

bois

 

préfère

 

cent

 

citron

 

pipi

 

main

 

loup

 

 

enfant

 

moi

 

mon

 

vin

 

préfère

 

lundi

 

fleur

 

musique

 

manger

 

route

 

allons

 

souris

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,