Skip to main content

Les Champs-Élysées de l'avenir

In 2022 a plan to transform the Champs-Élysées into a sort of pedestrain garden was put forward. originally it was to be ready for 2024 and the Olympic games. I now read the project has been pushed back to 2030. The resource below could be used with a high-performing GCSE class, or a Y12 class working on a 'patrimoine' theme.

Les Champs-Élysées du futur

Students should watch the accompanying video first. It's a longer-than-usual video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pplyJ-Mc-8U&t=177s   (5m 26)

À Paris, les architectes de PCA-STREAM transforment les Champs-Élysées. Il y aura moins de bruit, moins de pollution, et beaucoup plus de nature ! Les centres-villes consomment beaucoup d’énergie et produisent beaucoup de pollution, de déchets et de bruit. Alors, les architectes utiliseraient l’écologie pour diminuer les nuisances environnementales. La transformation de la célèbre avenue parisienne devrait être terminée avant 2030. Ce sera comment ?

On réduira les routes pour les automobiles et d’autres véhicules et on élargira des trottoirs et des pistes cyclables. Donc moins de bruit, moins de pollution, plus d’écomobilité !

Avec cette transformation, la place de la Concorde deviendrait entièrement réservée aux piétons. Avec 400 nouveaux arbres, il y aurait des zones ombragées plus respirables et des sols plus absorbants pour l’eau de pluie.

Dans les jardins il y aurait des événements variés, par exemple sur la gastronomie, le sport, le bien‑être, les arts et les sciences. Les enfants joueraient dans des parcs avec des jeux, un « arbre en arbre », des jeux d’eaux et une piscine.

Les marcheurs profiteraient de jolis jardins et d’autres espaces verts : des salons et tunnels transformeraient la qualité de l’air.

Les promeneurs viendraient regarder l’Arc de Triomphe dans un nouvel environnement végétal.

On verrait une cinquantaine de toits végétalisés le long de l’avenue.

Des plantes adaptées aux changement climatique offriraient plus de nature et d’ombre aux visiteurs.

Bref, une vraie ville verte !

 

Vocabulaire

there will be - __ _ ____     to consume – c_______         waste – d_____ (m. pl)

noise – b____ (m)              to reduce – d________           pollutant – n_______ (f)

should be – d_____ ____     to widen – é______       pavement – t_______ (m)

would become – d________   pedestrian – p______ (m)      tree – a____ (m)

there would be – i_ _ _____     shaded – o_________     well-being – b___-___ (m)

green area – e_____- ____ (m)    would transform – a______________

you would see – o_ v_____     roof – t____ (m)          shade – o____ (f)

 

Vrai (V), faux (F) ou pas mentionné (PM) ?

1.    Des architectes transformeront les Champs-Élysées.                       ___

2.    Les Champs-Élysées seront moins pollués alors.                             ___

3.    Les centres-villes ne consomment pas beaucoup d’énergie.            ___

4.    Les nuisances incluent le bruit, les déchets et la pollution.               ___

5.    Paris est plus pollué que Londres.                                                     ___

6.    On augmentera le nombre de routes pour les véhicules.                  ___

7.    La place de la Concorde serait réservée aux voitures électriques.   ___

8.    On planterait quarante nouveaux arbres.                                           ___

9.    L’air serait plus facile à respirer.                                                         ___

10.  On créerait un nouveau lac.                                                               ___

11.  Il y aurait des événements divers dans les jardins.                           ___

12.  Il y aurait un festival de musique.                                                       ___

13.  Les enfants pourraient jouer dans des parcs.                                    ___

14.  Il y aurait de la végétation près de l’Arc de Triomphe.                      ___

15.  On créerait des toits végétalisés.                                                       ___

16.  Il y aurait moins de nature pour les visiteurs.                                     ___

Grammar

Which two tenses are mainly used in the articles/ Give three examples of each from the text.

      French                              Meaning in English               Name of tense

1.    __________________            ___________________          __________________

2.    __________________            ___________________          __________________

3.    __________________            ___________________          __________________

4.    __________________            ___________________          __________________

5.    __________________            ___________________          __________________

6.    __________________            ___________________          __________________

Test a partner

From memory, ask your partner to translate ten words from the text into English. Then swap.

Summary

In about 15 bullet points in English, summarise the article.


 

Answers

V/F/PM

1. V   2.V   3. F   4. V   5. PM   6. F   7. F   8. F   9. V   10. PM   11. V   12. PM  

13. V    14. V    15. V    16. F

 

Summary – example bullet points

Architects to transform the Champs-Élysées to make it greener

Reduce noise and pollution

Project due to be finished by 2030

Roads to be reduced

Pavements widened.

More cycle lanes

CE to be become pedestrian only

Tree planting to create shade and better air

Ground able to absorb more rainwater

Various events to take place

Play areas, water games and a swimming pool

Gardens and green areas for walkers

Vegetation around the Arc de Triomphe

About 50 green roofs

Planting to reflect climate change

More greenery and shade for visitors

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics