Skip to main content

Planning to write a book about teaching A-level languages

I like to have a project, and I recently suggested to my friend and fellow former languages teacher Steve Glover that we could do something useful to help teachers develop their skill at teaching A-level languages. The provisional title of our book is Teaching A-Level Modern Languages

My own expertise in this field is as a teacher who taught A-level French for 32 years and who writes a lot of resources for A-level teachers and students. I am well read about second language acquisition and, as you may know, have written a good deal about language teaching already, including with Gianfranco Conti. 

Steve Glover runs the website dolanguages.com (formerly alevelfrench.com) and has a great deal of expertise in the production of resources for A-Level. He also taught A-level when he was a full-time teacher and he now writes and runs courses for teachers. Steve was a pioneer in using internet technology for language teaching - I first came across his work when he made The Really Useful French Teaching Site. (I hope I recall that correctly.) 

Steve and I have often chewed the cud about language teaching over the years, notably during walks around the countryside of northern England. I am looking forward to this collaboration - it's long overdue.

As far as I know, there is no book covering all aspects of A-level teaching at the moment, although I often recommend the excellent book by Kaherine Raithby and Alison Taylor on teaching literature at A-level. I reviewed it here. (If you teach literature, you should really get this book.)

We are in the early planning stages, but you can expect us to cover areas such as: general principles such as the role of input and communication, exploiting aural and written texts, interculurual understanding, task-based methodology, teaching film and literature, preparing for assessment and developing essay-writing skill. We shall no doubt look carefully at the various specifications, on the assumption that there will be no major changes in the next very few years. Let's see what the Labour government want to do. We may also get into international A-levels and IB - we'll see.

We shall give examples of lesson plans and a multitude of specific activities which we know work well at advanced evel. The book will be useful for teachers in training, recently qualified teachers and more experienced practitioners. (Yes, writers often say that, but I know from my own long experience, that even veteran teachers have plenty to learn and frequently welcome different ideas.)

We expect this project to take a few months, but in the end we hope to produce something of real value for language teachers in England, Wales and elsewhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics