Skip to main content

Portrait d'enfant video listening

 I've long been a fan of the 'Portrait d'enfant' short videos from Arte. I like them for a few reasons:

  • The language is quite comprehensible for average to higher-attaining pupils at GCSE (and even Y9). (Roughly CEFR A2.) Although the videos vary in difficulty, the worksheet design can include exercise types or scaffolding to make them accessible and enjoyable.
  • They are short - just over two minutes. This means that you can play over material several times to encourage thorough processing of the language. It's the 'less is more' principle: better to repeat a limited range of language many times, than to expose students to occasional use of vocabulary and structures which they are less likely to retain. I design my exercises to encourage through processing (intensive listening, if you like). This is more productive than just asking a few comprehension questions or true-false questions
  • Best of all, the videos are inherently interesting and eye-opening to our pupils. They are a type of what Stephen Krashen would call 'compelling input' - the content holds attention.

Below is a worksheet I just uploaded to frenchteacher.net. Help yourself. Here's the video;



Portrait d’enfant : Aqui au Bangladesh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP0dxoTdDkQ&list=PLE7b0lEr_S_fWHCUWRmjnKs0asTuiLLwT&index=30

Each sentence has an error. Underline it and write in the correct version. Below is some vocab to help.

vêtements propres – clean clothes   le riz – rice   se baigner – to swim   une inondation – flood    une barque – rowing boat       jouer aux osselets – to play jacks   une chèvre – goat  nettoyer la maison – to clean the house

 

1.    Aqui a onze ans.

2.    Elle a trois sœurs.

3.    Ils ont cinq petits canetons (ducklings).

4.    Ils n’ont pas de vaches (cows).

5.    Avant d’aller à l’école les filles jouent au football.

6.    Elles s’habillent en uniforme scolaire.

7.    Papa prépare le riz pour le petit déjeuner.

8.    Elles vont à l’école à vélo.

9.    L’école est dans une forêt.

10.  Elles étudient le bengali, et deux autres matières.

11.  Aqui préfère les maths.

12.  Le jeudi est un jour saint (holy day).

13.  Il n’y a pas d’école le samedi.

14.  Elle joue avec tout le monde, sauf (except) une fille.

15.  Après l’école les filles jouent au football.

16.  Aqui nourrit (feeds) un mouton (sheep).

17.  Ensuite elle aide à faire la cuisine (do the cooking).

18.  Les filles n’ont pas de devoirs.

19.  Aqui voudrait être professeure ou fermière.


Réponses

1.                1. Aqui a douze ans.

2.    Elle a deux sœurs.

3.    Ils ont six petits canetons (ducklings).

4.    Ils ont des vaches (cows).

5.    Avant d’aller à l’école les filles vont se baigner/se baignent.

6.    Elles s’habillent en vêtements propres..

7.    Maman prépare le riz pour le petit déjeuner.

8.    Elles vont à l’école en barque/en bateau.

9.    L’école est dans un bateau.

10.  Elles étudient le bengali, et trois autres matières.

11.  Aqui préfère le bengali.

12.  Le vendredi est un jour saint (holy day).

13.  Il y a école le samedi.

14.  Elle joue avec tout le monde, sauf (except) un garçon.

15.  Après l’école les filles jouent aux osselets.

16.  Aqui nourrit (feeds) une chèvre.

17.  Ensuite elle aide à nettoyer la maison.

18.  Les filles ont des devoirs.

19.  Aqui voudrait être professeure ou docteur(e).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics