Skip to main content

AQA IGCSE exams (AQA Certificate)

http://www.aqa.org.uk/subjects/french/aqa-certificate/french-8655/past-papers-and-mark-schemes

I've just got round to having a look at the specimen papers for the AQA IGCSE examination. These, by the way, are very good revision material for existing GCSE exams. Teachers could easily make use of the reading and listening papers, including audio files, with their classes.

At the moment we are being told that there will be no tiers in future, post 2016 exams. I hope this is not the case, but the AQA IGCSE papers are tiered, with overlap sections, just as we see with the traditional GCSE.

The four skills are equally weighted at 25% each. This is more sensible than the weightings for GCSE, but in my view, still allows too many marks for writing.

There are four general topic areas: Socialising, Travelling Abroad, Being Part of a Community and Making Choices. Each of these includes three sub-topics. The content is refreshingly simple and relevant, I would say. AQA provide a simple skeleton scheme of work, teaching guidance and sample oral tests.

As far as the specimen papers are concerned, the listening and reading material is very familiar in style and content. I won't dwell on this. Suffice it to say that there is the usual mix of matching, multi-choice and answers in English. Reading last 35 or 45 minutes depending on tier, whilst Listening last 30 or 40 minutes, plus reading time.

The speaking and writing material is what may interest teachers most, since this is where IGCSE departs from GCSE, given the absence of controlled assessment. The test last a maximum of 9 minutes plus 2 minutes preparation time.

The Speaking test (untiered) consists of a three minute photo section (based on a topic from the specification) where students have two minutes to study and a photo and one minute to answer a set of questions, including  five compulsory starter ones which the teacher must ask from the card. After the photo section, there is general conversation based on two further topics from the specification.

This style of test requires more spontaneity on the part of pupils and will therefore be more taxing for the less able. Pupils with higher aptitude will be able to shine, just as they can with the traditional GCSE. Learned presentations are a thing of the past with this exam, although pupils will no doubt rehearse conversations as they have for many years. I would imagine the photo section will be the most challenging for weak students since  unrehearsed answers will be required.  I am not sure if students are allowed to write notes whilst preparing the photo; it would seem not given the brief time allowed for preparation.

The Writing exam is tiered with an overlap section.

At Foundation level there is a first section with guided answers from English prompts in the form: "Say what..." "Say how...". This is followed by a choice of two compositions (80-100 words) with brief glossaries of four words. There are 20 marks available with 12 allocated for content, the rest for Range/Accuracy. Given that pupils are likely to produce some very inaccurate language, the mark scheme is suitably forgiving. It will need to be.

At Higher Tier the choice of the same two short composition as at Foundation is available, followed by a choice of two longer compositions (150-200 words). At least two tenses are expected and the mark scheme is weighted in the same way as at Foundation. The structure of this Higher Tier paper looks like a return to the style of papers before the advent of controlled assessment. Students are likely to produce more inaccurate work, but the mark scheme should allow for this to produce a typical range of grades.

Overall, teachers may feel that the IGCSE paper will suit able pupils well, discourage rote memorisation of written and spoken chunks. They may be concerned that their weaker candidates will struggle with this greater spontaneity.

Is this a template for future exams post 2016? Quite possibly, though there may be some pressure to include elements from the latest National Curriculum, notably translation. I would be surprised and dismayed if we ended up seeing "set piece" translation sentences or paragraphs, but one writing task could, for example, be guided by bullet point sentences in English which would effectively require summary or translation. This might even suit the weakest candidates who often do not know what to write unless they are given a specific guide.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.

Attitudes16





An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at dolanguages.com, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’(http://pdcinmfl.com). The point i…