Skip to main content

L'état des choses dans l'enseignement des langues vivantes

Ayant réfléchi à cette question, j'ai décidé d'écrire mes pensées sous forme d'essai (en anglais). Dans le cas peu probable que quelqu'un veuille le lire: le-voici:

http://www.frenchteacher.net/stateoftheart.doc

Comments

  1. This has made enlightening (if slightly worrying) reading for someone about to embark on their NQT year. I'm at the start of my language teaching career and have lots to learn, but it seems to me that what you say is spot on, particularly that ours is a utalitarian age. It seems to me that the current system of education is functional, mechanical and obsessed with achievement of targets - but achievement at the expense of an educational experience providing opportunity for enrichment, enjoyment and learning for the sake of learning. I accept that not all children will love the study of languages per se but it seems to me that today's learners are all TOO aware of targets, levels of attainment and focused all too young on the ultimate goal of 'getting a good job'. It seems to me that the pertinent questions are twofold: first, how to get the government to place higher value on the study of languages and second, how to attract children to languages at age 14 in the meantime - perhaps a detailed study of what motivates our current learners and an action plan based on this would help? My experiences are very limited and I'm trying to become as informed as I can about language-teaching and the current state of affairs so thanks for an interesting and incisive read!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment. I really hope you are not put off at all! But I do hope you find yourself in departments where the latest initiatives are kept in perspective and where the focus is on good lessons, hard work and enjoyment. Best of luck for your NQT year. Do get in touch via frenchteacher.net if you need any advice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,