Skip to main content

Ryanair : lève-toi et vole

Article tiré de metrofrance.com

Payer moins cher restant debout. Payer plus cher en allant aux toilettes. Voilà ce que compte proposer la compagnie aérienne Ryanair à ses clients.

Un avion de 
la flotte de la compagnie aérienne low cost irlandaise Ryanair.
Image: metrofrance.com

Un avion de la flotte de la compagnie aérienne low cost irlandaise Ryanair.
Photo : bigpresh/flickr.com
La compagnie aérienne low cost Ryanair est passée à l'acte. Après avoir abandonné l'idée d'une taxe sur les gros, elle confirme vouloir lancer des offres de vols debout et rendre l'accès aux toilettes payant. Pour environ 5 livres (6 euros), il sera possible de voyager à moindre prix sur les vols de la compagnie mais au sacrifice du confort. Un espace "zone debout" va être créé à l'arrière des 250 avions qui composent la flotte de Ryanair.
"Nous avons l'intention de supprimer les dix derniers rangs des appareils pour pouvoir y mettre des stations verticales. De la sorte, nous aurons 15 rangs assis et l'équivalent de 10 rangs debout", a expliqué Michael O'Leary, le directeur de la compagnie irlandaise, selon le quotidien britannique Daily Telegraph.
Un porte-parole de Ryanair a précisé que Boeing avait été consulté pour pratiquer ces modifications et installer des "sièges verticaux" où la personne reste debout tout en étant attachée comme le veulent les consignes de sécurité. Le prix de ce type de billet devrait varier entre 5 et 10 euros. Reste encore à pratiquer des tests de sécurité sur ces sièges verticaux, ce qui sera fait l'année prochaine mais qui laisse sceptique l'Organisation de l'aviation civile internationale.
Par ailleurs, il a annoncé qu'il allait désormais falloir débourser 1 livre (1,20 euros) pour avoir accès aux commodités des appareils sur les vols de moins d'une heure. L'objectif est d'encourager les passagers à prendre leurs précautions et à utiliser les toilettes des aéroports plutôt que ceux présents à bord des avions. Il faut donc s'attendre à voir apparaître des toilettes à ouverture déclenchée par l'insertion d'une pièce de monnaie dans les avions de la compagnie low cost.

******************************************************************************
D'autres idées pour Ryanair: (simplyflying.com)
The airline has launched a competition where anyone in Europe can suggest ideas by email to competition@ryanair.com on how RyanAir can make more money off their customers! The best idea wins €1,000.
Some of the wackiest ideas are already stated on RyanAir’s website:
  • Charging for toilet paper – with O’Leary’s face on it,
  • Charging €2.50 to read the safety cards,
  • Charging €1 to use oxygen masks,
  • Charging €25 to use the emergency exit,
  • Charging €50 for bikini clad Cabin Crew.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is "Input Processing"?

Input Processing (IP) was proposed by Bill VanPatten, Professor of Spanish and Second Language Acquisition from Michigan State University. Bill may be known to some of you from his podcast show Tea with BVP. He is one of those rare university academics who makes a specific effort to engage with practising teachers. IP was first proposed in a 1993 article (published with T. Cadierno in the Modern Language Journal) entitled "Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction." My summary of it is based on an article "Input Processing and Processing Instruction: Definitions and Issues" (2013) by Hossein Hashemnezhad. IP is a little complicated to explain, but I'll do my best to summarise the key points before suggesting how it relates to other ways of looking at classroom language teaching. Is this actually any use to teachers? I apologise in advance for over-simplifying or misunderstanding. To paraphrase Dr Leonard McCoy from Star Trek &q

Delayed dictation

Image: pixabay.com What is “delayed dictation”? Instead of getting students to transcribe immediately what you say, or what a partner says, you can enforce a 10 second delay so that students have to keep running over in their heads what they have heard. Some teachers have even used the delay time to try to distract students with music. It’s an added challenge for students but has significant value, I think. It reminds me of a phenomenon in music called audiation. I use it frequently as a singer and I bet you do too. Audiation is thought to be the foundation of musicianship. It takes place when we hear and comprehend music for which the sound is no longer or may never have been present. You can audiate when listening to music, performing from notation, playing “by ear,” improvising, composing, or notating music. When we have a song going round in our mind we are audiating. When we are deliberately learning a song we are audiating. In our language teaching case, though, the

Using sentence builder frames for GCSE speaking and writing preparation

Some teachers have cottoned on to the fact that sentence builders (aka substitution tables) are a very useful tool for helping students prepare for their GCSE speaking and writing tests. My own hunch is that would help for students of all levels of proficiency, but may be particularly helpful for those likely to get lower grades, say between 3-6. Much depends, of course, on how complex you make the table. To remind you, here is a typical sentence builder, as found on the frenchteacher site. The topic is talking about where you live. A word of warning - formatting blogs in Blogger is a nightmare when you start with Word documents, so apologies for any issues. It might have taken me another 30 minutes just to sort out the html code underlying the original document. Dans ma ville (in my town) Dans ma région (In my area) il y a (there is/are) des banques (banks) des cafés (cafes) des

Pros and cons of pair and group work

Most teachers have made frequent use of pair and group work for many years, notably since the rise of communicative language teaching in the 1980s. Even before then it would have been common for pupils to work in pairs on simple role-play and dialogue tasks. So pair and group work is standard practice, if not universally supported by language teachers. It’s always worth evaluating, however, whether a practice works - whether, in this case, it helps students develop their proficiency. Pros Rod Ellis (2005) summarises the advantages of pair/group work (based on Jacobs, 1998) “1. The quantity of learner speech can increase. In teacher-fronted classrooms, the teacher typically speaks 80% of the time; in groupwork more students talk for more of the time. 2. The variety of speech acts can increase. In teacher-fronted classrooms, students are cast in a responsive role, but in groupwork they can perform a wide range of roles, including those involved in the negotiation of meaning. 3. There can