Skip to main content

MFL degrees for the wealthy

Today's Observer reports that the Sutton Trust, an education charity, has released a report based on 2008 data showing that students from wealthier backgrounds and independent schools make up a disproportionately large percentage of young people studying arts subjects, and particularly modern languages.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/sep/26/arts-degrees-wealthy-humanities-university

30% of languages graduates came from the wealthiest homes. UCAS figures show that while 9% of all graduates come from independent schools, for modern languages the figure is 23%. It is between 12% and 20% for history, classics and archaeology degrees. Languages are increasingly becoming the preserve of well-to-do classes.

I have no idea how these numbers compare with those of the past, but it is a concern that the rapid decline in modern languages at key Stage 4 and at A-level is felt almost uniquely in the state, comprehensive sector. Even in the independent and selective sector, languages have come under pressure because of the wider range of options available. At my own (selective) school, the growth and popularity of subjects such as psychology, theatre studies and business studies at A-level, has led to a slight reduction in those studying A-level languages. In our own case, it has also been notable that the ability profile of A-level linguists has risen. We have fewer less able students taking on a language at A-level. The data on A-level grades reveals that this is a national phenomenon.

At Ripon Grammar School we have seen a rise in the number of students doing French in Y12 (because of the AS level system), but a fall in those doing A2 level. 15 years ago we would have averaged around 18-22 at A2 level. We now get around 12 to 15. At AS level we see between 20 and 30.

Maybe it is a good thing that students have more choice and a chance to fulfil themselves in subjects they enjoy and are good at, but it remains the case that Britain is short of well qualified linguists and that many quite able students in state schools are falling by the wayside even before they get to A-level.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,